> > […] > > >> But as soon as the core and modules (or some of the modules) are > >> physically separated, e.g. by putting them in different branches or > >> sub-projects, a lot of complexity is added: > >> > >> * Continuous integration > >> * Quality control > >> * Release management > >> > >> Therefore I'm hesitant to suggest such a construct. > >> > >> Do you think we would get more patches/features/bugfixes by separating > >> (peripheral) modules from the core? > > > > It seems for me that things are getting complicated and I'm not shure that > > a module plattform will be successful. > > When we use the wiki to collect modules like wik proposed earlier, wie can > > find out how good the idea of module > > contribution is accepted by the community. So I propose to set up a wiki > > page where people can list the modules they would like > > to provide and modules they need. > > > > If we have enough contibutions, we'll find a way how we can do it. > > +1, this sounds like a reasonable approach. > > I also wouldn't mind to add contributions to the sandbox in SVN, if > multiple contributors are interested in participating in the development > and want to provide patches.
Putting the contributions into the sandbox sounds very good from my PoV. +1 Rudolf > > -- Andreas > > > -- > Andreas Hartmann, CTO > BeCompany GmbH > http://www.becompany.ch > Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
