It actually does compile with javac, it's just maven that isn't happy about it.

Philip

On 4/28/08, Philip Jägenstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I've been keeping the Java door open (and gotten a bit enamoured
>  with it) I am still interested. Maybe I'll even write some code in
>  Python and some in Java, if that's possible... I'm guessing it's not
>  possible for two programs to use the sasme datastore at the same time
>  though, which could potentially be a problem.
>
>  Also, I'm feeling slightly retarded this morning as I can't figure out
>  a good place to put my RelationshipTypes enum in Java. Essentially it
>  needs to be package global, so all I can think of is creating a silly
>  little class like this:
>
>  public class Mush {
>     public static enum Types implements RelationshipType {
>         MUSICBRAINZ,
>         ARTISTS,
>         ARTIST
>     }
>  }
>
>  This doesn't compile:
>  [INFO] Compilation failure
>  /home/philip/mushup/neo4j/src/main/java/org/foolip/mushup/Mush.java:[6,29]
>  ';' expected
>
>  6,29 is just after "Types" (and yes I'm trying Maven)
>
>  Can anyone offer some boilerplate code that acutally compiles? I'm
>  just that a Java wiz y'know...
>
>
>  Philip
>
>
>  On 4/28/08, Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I've been hacking away throughout the weekend, and the Python bindings are
>  >  up to date now. I have tested them with my sample programs on the latest 
> RC
>  >  of Neo. These basically just creates a few nodes, relates them and sets a
>  >  bunch of properties, then performs some traversals and reads some of the
>  >  properties. The API of the Python bindings supports one or two other
>  >  features than those demoed in the sample program, but I have focused on
>  >  updating the bindings, updating the documentation is a later project.
>  >  One thing that would be nice was if someone would use the Python bindings
>  >  and keep me notified on any bugs or other issues. Philip, are you still
>  >  interested?
>  >
>  >  happy hacking
>  >
>  > /Tobias
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Tobias Ivarsson <
>  >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  >  > For some reason my first response has not arrived to the list, here is a
>  >  > copy of that e-mail.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>  >  > From: Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > Date: Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:35 PM
>  >  > Subject: Re: [Neo] Maturity of Python bindings?
>  >  > To: Neo user discussions <user@lists.neo4j.org>, Philip Jägenstedt <
>  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > The short answer: They are not up to date.
>  >  > Updating them is on my ToDo-list. That task will probably take me less
>  >  > than a day. This week, up until Friday is all filled up with other
>  >  > ToDo-items, but with someone wanting to use the Python bindings I could 
> get
>  >  > them up to date this weekend. Would that be sufficient for you or is 
> "Usable
>  >  > on Monday" a state that will make you miss your deadline if you go with
>  >  > Python?
>  >  >
>  >  > Also, I have a three hour train ride an hour from now. Depending on the
>  >  > state of the work I am doing at this very moment I might be able to 
> push in
>  >  > an hour or two of hacking on the Python bindings today, which would 
> bring it
>  >  > up to date before tomorrow. I'll post a notification tonight on the 
> state of
>  >  > that.
>  >  >
>  >  > /Tobias
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > > Hi!
>  >  > >
>  >  > > I'm doing a technology survey for an "advanced web programming" course
>  >  > > where I intent to use Neo. Before deciding whether to use Java or
>  >  > > Python on the server side I'd like to ask how reliable the Python
>  >  > > bindings are. Are they up to date, battle tested and ready, or can I
>  >  > > expect to bump into problems that take a week to fix (thus missing my
>  >  > > deadline)?
>  >  > >
>  >  > > Philip Jägenstedt
>  >  > > _______________________________________________
>  >  > > Neo mailing list
>  >  > > User@lists.neo4j.org
>  >  > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>  >  > >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > --
>  >  > Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > Hacker, Neo Technology
>  >  > www.neotechnology.com
>  >  > Cellphone: +46 706 534857
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > --
>  >  > Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > Hacker, Neo Technology
>  >  > www.neotechnology.com
>  >  > Cellphone: +46 706 534857
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  --
>  >  Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  Hacker, Neo Technology
>  >  www.neotechnology.com
>  >  Cellphone: +46 706 534857
>  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  Neo mailing list
>  >  User@lists.neo4j.org
>  >  https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>  >
>
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to