On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Marc Preddie <mpred...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Johan,
> That's what I initially suspected, and so I ran a small test to output the
> relationship in question, and there is only one.
>
> But wouldn't the same error occur when using a single thread, if there were
> more than one relationship of the same type and I invoked
> getSingleRelationship...

If there is no writing going on it shouldn't matter if you are reading
with one or many threads, they should all return the same
relationships.

>
> If it helps at all I'm running on winxp 64bit.
>
> I'm going to try to replicate the issue with using a small sample and if I
> can, would it be helpful to send it you?
>

It would be very helpful if you can send me sample code that reproduce
the issue.

Regards,
-Johan
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to