On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Marc Preddie <mpred...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Johan, > That's what I initially suspected, and so I ran a small test to output the > relationship in question, and there is only one. > > But wouldn't the same error occur when using a single thread, if there were > more than one relationship of the same type and I invoked > getSingleRelationship...
If there is no writing going on it shouldn't matter if you are reading with one or many threads, they should all return the same relationships. > > If it helps at all I'm running on winxp 64bit. > > I'm going to try to replicate the issue with using a small sample and if I > can, would it be helpful to send it you? > It would be very helpful if you can send me sample code that reproduce the issue. Regards, -Johan _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user