No we do nothing like that so I do not think that is the problem. I will have a look at your store to see if I can get any clues to what the problem might be.
-Johan On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Rick Bullotta <rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com> wrote: > One possible hint? > > http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/fi-FI/w7itprogeneral/thread/df935 > a52-a0a9-4f67-ac82-bc39e0585148 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On > Behalf Of Johan Svensson > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 1:11 PM > To: Neo4j user discussions > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Urgent: Block Not In Use error > > That setup should not be a problem. Anything else you can think of > that was out of the ordinary before the task got terminated or after > (stacktraces, disk full, concurrent process trying to access the same > store files etc)? > > You can contact me off-list if it would be possible for me to have a > look at the store. > > -Johan > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Rick Bullotta > <rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com> wrote: >> Hi, Johan. >> >> I might have missed the recovery attempt being logged, but here's the >> basics: >> >> - it was a non-clean shutdown but not a powerdown (task terminated). >> - the nodes that seem to be exhibiting the odd behavior were not being >> written to at the time, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything >> - the OS is Windows 7/64-bit >> - the storage is a Samsung SSD, NTFS, no compression >> >> Hope that helps, >> >> Rick _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
