Hi Michael,

On 2011-04-21, at 4:38 PM, Michael Hunger wrote:

> Bob,
> 
> I don't know if you have already answered these questions. 
> 
> Which JDK (also version) are you using for that, what are the JVM memory 
> settings?

Sun's java 1.6 patch level 24 (I think I'll have to confirm on Monday)

Memory settings... from the top of my head... there's a GC setting that I can't 
recall, and the min and max heap is set to 12GB (which it never comes close to)

> 
> Do you have a profiler handy that you could throw at your benchmark? (E.g. 
> yourkit has a 30 day trial, other profilers surely too).

Monday for that too.

> 
> Do you have the source code of your tests at hand? So we could run exactly 
> the same code on our own Linux systems for cross checking?

If it's useful I can probably extract something, starting Monday :-)

> 
> What Linux distribution is it, and 64 or 32 bit? Do you also have a disk 
> formatted with ext3 to cross check? (Perhaps just a loopback device).

Ubuntu 10.10 64bit. The machine has been set up as ext4, I'll see what I can 
scrounge up for ext3.

> 
> How much memory does the linux box have available?

16GB

> 
> Thanks so much.
> 

Thank you.

Cheers,
Bob

> Michael
> 
> Am 21.04.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Bob Hutchison:
> 
>> 
>> On 2011-04-20, at 7:30 AM, Tobias Ivarsson wrote:
>> 
>>> Sorry I got a bit distracted when writing this. I should have added that I
>>> then want you to send the results of running that benchmark to me so that I
>>> can further analyze what the cause of these slow writes might be.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Tobias
>> 
>> That's what I figured you meant. Sorry for the delay, here they are:
>> 
>> On a HP z400, quad Xeon W3550 @ 3.07GHz
>> ext4 filesystem
>> -----
>> 
>>>> dd if=/dev/urandom of=store bs=1M count=1000
>> 1000+0 records in
>> 1000+0 records out
>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 111.175 s, 9.4 MB/s
>>>> dd if=store of=/dev/null bs=100M
>> 10+0 records in
>> 10+0 records out
>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.281153 s, 3.7 GB/s
>>>> dd if=store of=/dev/null bs=100M
>> 10+0 records in
>> 10+0 records out
>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.244339 s, 4.3 GB/s
>>>> dd if=store of=/dev/null bs=100M
>> 10+0 records in
>> 10+0 records out
>> 1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 0.242583 s, 4.3 GB/s
>> 
>> 
>>>> ./run ../store logfile 33 100 500 100
>> tx_count[100] records[31397] fdatasyncs[100] read[0.9881029 MB] 
>> wrote[1.9762058 MB]
>> Time was: 5.012
>> 19.952114 tx/s, 6264.365 records/s, 19.952114 fdatasyncs/s, 201.87897 kB/s 
>> on reads, 403.75793 kB/s on writes
>> 
>>>> ./run ../store logfile 33 1000 5000 10 
>> tx_count[10] records[30997] fdatasyncs[10] read[0.9755144 MB] 
>> wrote[1.9510288 MB]
>> Time was: 0.604
>> 16.556292 tx/s, 51319.54 records/s, 16.556292 fdatasyncs/s, 1653.8523 kB/s 
>> on reads, 3307.7046 kB/s on writes
>> 
>>>> ./run ../store logfile 33 1000 5000 100 
>> tx_count[100] records[298245] fdatasyncs[100] read[9.386144 MB] 
>> wrote[18.772287 MB]
>> Time was: 199.116
>> 0.5022198 tx/s, 1497.8455 records/s, 0.5022198 fdatasyncs/s, 48.270412 kB/s 
>> on reads, 96.540825 kB/s on writes
>> 
>> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu----
>> r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa
>> 1  2      0 8541712 336716 3670940    0    0     1     7   12   20  4  1 95  >> 0
>> 0  2      0 8525712 336716 3670948    0    0     0   979 1653 3186  4  1 60 
>> 35
>> 1  2      0 8525220 336716 3671204    0    0     0  1244 1671 3150  4  1 71 
>> 24
>> 0  2      0 8524724 336716 3671332    0    0     0   709 1517 3302  4  1 65 
>> 30
>> 0  2      0 8524476 336716 3671460    0    0     0  1033 1680 69342  5  7 59 
>> 29
>> 0  2      0 8539168 336716 3671588    0    0     0  1375 1599 3272  3  1 70 
>> 25
>> 1  2      0 8538860 336716 3671716    0    0     0  1157 1594 3097  3  1 72 
>> 24
>> 0  1      0 8541340 336716 3671844    0    0     0  1151 1512 3182  3  2 70 
>> 25
>> 0  1      0 8524812 336716 3671972    0    0     0  1597 1641 3391  4  2 72 
>> 22
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

----
Bob Hutchison
Recursive Design Inc.
http://www.recursive.ca/
weblog: http://xampl.com/so




_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to