Thanks Alexander for the info,

we should try to add this to the documentation for performance tuning at
https://github.com/neo4j/community/blob/master/kernel/src/docs/ops/jvm.txt

It would be great to add a section on tuning the OS for high IO. Just added
one :)

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

GTalk:      neubauer.peter
Skype       peter.neubauer
Phone       +46 704 106975
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
http://startupbootcamp.org/    - Ă–resund - Innovation happens HERE.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.


On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Alexander Smirnov <alsmirn...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I have some clue about this problem. I did face it before, though not
> with Neo4j but with other programs that intensive use disks. For
> example, my linux box completely frozen by svn update command for huge
> projects. The symptoms are same  : low CPU load with high iowait ( in
> your message, I saw 23% for iowait load ).
> MySQL faces the same problem:
> http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?s=linux+high+io+wait
> There are some recommendations:
> 1) Tune io scheduler for disk with database.
> 2) disable access time update: noatime,nodiratime flags for disk mount
> command or /etc/fstab.
>
> Not sure what it can help a lot, though.
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Marco Gerber <mger...@junisphere.net>
> wrote:
> > Hello everybody
> >
> > A collection of reference benchmarks would be great, but completely
> independent of this, my problem is making my application on linux as
> performant as on windows.
> >
> > Thanks guys,
> > Marco
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org on behalf of Rick Bullotta
> > Sent: Mon 30.05.2011 18:02
> > To: j...@neotechnology.com; user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] performance issues with ubuntu
> >
> > Hi, Jim.
> >
> > Not really thinking of benchmarks, which I agree are tricky to define and
> even trickier to standardize.  Plus, given the nearly infinitely cool things
> you can do with neo, it borders on impossible.
> >
> > Rather, I'm just thinking of wikifying some of the platform specific best
> practices and gotchas/known issues for each.
> >
> > Rick
> >
> > ----- Reply message -----
> > From: "Jim Webber" <j...@neotechnology.com>
> > Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 11:55 am
> > Subject: [Neo4j] performance issues with ubuntu
> > To: "Neo4j user discussions" <user@lists.neo4j.org>
> >
> > Hi Rick,
> >
> > I concur that we should perhaps have some perf figures, but it's one of
> those things that's easier said than done.
> >
> > For instance, right now we have performance tests running as part of the
> Windows/Linux/Mac continuous build and we will fail the build if we drop on
> those numbers. Yet creating representative benchmarks (similar to the TPC-X
> benchmarks perhaps) is not only difficult, but will almost certainly be of
> no use to users or customers when choosing a graph database or in designing
> out their own solutions because your access patterns are likely to be so
> different from the benchmark patterns.
> >
> > But if the community could come together and loosely agree upon some
> representative benchmarks that would be useful to them
> (platform/setup/access pattern) then we could get something into our build
> and publishing numbers with a little effort.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> _________________
> entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
> (entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.)
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to