I forgot to state this, but a key requirement of tags of course is that you
can apply multiple of them to the same link.

Would you still go that route then?

If you want to delete a link from your bookmarks, it's a matter then of
deleting each tag edge?

Aseem

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Siddhartha Kasivajhula <
countvajh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Couldn't you use edges for "tags" instead of nodes?
>
> user1 --tag--> link1
> user2 --tag--> link1
> user1 --tag--> link2
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Aseem Kishore <aseem.kish...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > We're thinking about implementing tags in our system, and we're pondering
> a
> > few ideas for how we'd go about it, and none of them seem perfect. I'd
> like
> > to ask you guys: how would you design an analogous case: Del.icio.us?
> >
> > At the core, *users bookmark links*, so it makes sense to have "users"
> and
> > "links" as types of nodes, and "bookmark" as the type of edge that
> connects
> > them. Now, you can see all the links a given user has bookmarked, and all
> > the users that have bookmarked a given link.
> >
> > Now users can also *tag* links, of course, but the most interesting
> > requirement is that, when I'm looking at *my links*, I only want to see
> *my
> > tags*. Thus, tags can't be tied just to links; they have to be tied to
> > users
> > too. But most importantly, you have to maintain *which* user and *which*
> > link *each* tag is for.
> >
> > Thus, it seems most intuitive to us if we could have "tags" be nodes
> > that *point
> > to the "bookmark" edges*. Unfortunately, that's a hypergraph, which Neo4j
> > doesn't support.
> >
> > We could use intermediate nodes for bookmarks maybe, but that sort of
> sucks
> > to lose the intuitiveness of the graph and introduce redundant edges,
> more
> > complexity which makes consistency harder, etc.
> >
> > We have some other ideas, but I'm curious if any of you guys have thought
> > about this already or have done it, or if you guys have thoughts. Thanks
> in
> > advance!
> >
> > Aseem
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo4j mailing list
> > User@lists.neo4j.org
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to