You, something like Neo4js <https://github.com/neo4j/neo4js>? We've had that since forever. Or do you mean something different?
Andrés On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Peter Neubauer < peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Also, > there is another possibility: We are exposing a ECMA script execution > engine via the Traverse enpoints. Instead of trying to shoehorn the > traversal API into REST calls and then anyway executing script > snippets, Why not exposing a JavaScript plugin along exactly the same > lines as the Groovy plugin, and provide examples on how to use the > same usecases via that plugin, so we cover the traversal API that way? > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - NOSQL for the Enterprise. > http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. > > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jacob Hansson > <jacob.hans...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > > It would be interesting to rephrase the question like this: > > > > Are there any use cases that the REST traversal API covers, that we > > currently cannot replicate in Cypher or Gremlin? > > > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Peter Neubauer < > > peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > > > >> Well, > >> Andres has been putting the first algo into cypher and we are thinking > of > >> exposing them there so thru can be used as path functions in an > expression. > >> However, that will be step 2. WDYT? > >> On Oct 29, 2011 6:47 PM, "maxdemarzi" <maxdema...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > I think the traversal rest api is fine for my purposes, but if cypher > is > >> > where we want to go long term, then we need to deprecate it in 1.6 and > >> drop > >> > it in 1.7. > >> > > >> > This gives us some time to update our libraries and for cypher to > settle > >> > down. > >> > > >> > Are you guys thinking of getting rid of the rest built in graph > >> algorithms > >> > or are those there to stay? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > View this message in context: > >> > > >> > http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-REST-traverse-deprecation-tp3460396p3464979.html > >> > Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at > >> > Nabble.com. > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Neo4j mailing list > >> > User@lists.neo4j.org > >> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Neo4j mailing list > >> User@lists.neo4j.org > >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jacob Hansson > > Phone: +46 (0) 763503395 > > Twitter: @jakewins > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > User@lists.neo4j.org > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > User@lists.neo4j.org > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
