Yeah - I think putting them into SVN would be best - I'll do that later today.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On Feb 8, 2010, at 3:58 PM, David E Jones wrote:

> 
> That's great Tim. Thank you to you, and to Hotwax, for making these 
> available. With all of the work on color and adding seed data and such that 
> Laurian did these are really great diagrams (well, I guess I am biased about 
> that).
> 
> I guess the place that makes the most sense for now is attached to a page on 
> cwiki. If people start updating too much it might make sense to put them in 
> SVN somewhere, or maybe it would be better to start with that (in the 
> ofbiz/site directory would probably be best).
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> 
>> HotWax would love to donate these and the time that went into them from 
>> David Jones, John Maw and Laurian Escalanti.  It's a great set of 
>> information for people learning or using OFBiz - for those of you at 
>> ApacheCon New Orleans, we were handing these out at the booth.
>> 
>> Be warned that they haven't been updated in about a year, but they do have a 
>> ton of useful information that will be an amazing jump start to getting 
>> these efforts started up again.  David, just let me know where you'd like 
>> them and I'll get them posted and the effort can again be off to the races.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Ruppert
>> --
>> Tim Ruppert
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>> 
>> o:801.649.6594
>> f:801.649.6595
>> 
>> On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:31 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>> 
>>> If people are interested in making diagrams there is some stuff build into 
>>> OFBiz to export "eomodeld" files. That particular file format can be 
>>> imported by a few tools, but mostly on the Mac (my preferred tool being 
>>> OmniGraffle). Unfortunately the weeks I put into that code, organizing the 
>>> entities into groups, and then creating and organizing diagrams for the 
>>> groups, was done while I was part of Hotwax Media so I don't actually have 
>>> any rights to the diagrams any more, and I'm not sure what the situation is 
>>> with them (a Hotwax rep would have to answer that I guess).
>> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to