since during the first discussion I suggested this.
I find this a contradiction and an example of how designers reduce the ROI.
If this is acceptable, why was it not acceptable before the changes were
made.
to clarify
keep the original as flatgrey and the new one flatgreyII
=========================
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
<http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man
Erwan de FERRIERES sent the following on 1/21/2011 1:11 AM:
Le 21/01/2011 09:48, BJ Freeman a écrit :
as far as flatgrey I am with mike.
keep the original and make the updated one flatgreyII.
Create a jira issue, and add it your patch if you want if back. We can
also start a discussion on this base.
Anyway, as it was said before, books are based on stable versions, 9.04
or 10.04 in which is included the old flatgrey. So there is no harm done
from this point.
One more thing, how can one be surprised if things are changing and he
is not suscribing to dev and commit lists ?
