hi, i am also not sure of a few other practical issues. for eg. bulk uploading of new products and images. currently i assume most use the the xml file to import products data and then upload product images into 1 directory after re-sizing. though it appears that the existing image file system can be maintained, but does it make sense to have 2 different image file system, it can obviously be an issue when doing back-up maintenance etc.
The new image management contribution, does not seem complete as its not working fully on the demo server, when i checked last 03/09/11. Also there are many store which run ofbiz on the trunk. though the trunk may not be ideal for it, i still believe that the current structure should not have been removed so fast as many using ofbiz risk accidently deleting all their images. And instead of replacing the current directory structure a new directly may have used until the code matured and acquired more acceptance. Should it not be researched more, before it replaces the current structure. thanks Rohit ----- saanjhi.com -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1076507-deletes-the-images-folder-tp3343463p3347403.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
