Hi Eric see my answers inline
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 00:14 +0100, eric wrote: > Hi Hans, > > In your issue, you havn't written why your new image file system > (image.filename.format propertie) > is better than the original ? > Images are now grouped together by productid so can be managed more easily. > What about the multiple productId directories ? > Now an layer of directories is introduced which is used more often than the 5 directories it replaces which makes the retrieval a little faster, not slower. > Save image with ScaleImage.java is now conflicting with the old image > file system because create image filename like "large.jpg" ... No it does not because this 'large.jpg' is now stored in the productid directory, not in the 'large' directory. > What is the entity to request to find images related to a product, > uploaded by the image management ? There is no entity involved, they are stored in the filesystem and be retrieved just as before, just the directory structue is differently organized. > Or How request an image from the image management ? > see previous point. > Thanks > > Eric > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 19:41 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > For your information this is what the log message says: > > > > Log: > > issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4194: reorder of > > product images and extension of the <@ofbizcontenturl macro. A > > contribution of Antwebsystems employee Tukkata > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 04:20 -0800, rohit wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > i see that in this commit the images folders are being deleted. I assume > > > that anyone running ofbiz on its trunk would lose all the product images > > > if > > > they updated their code as the folder will be deleted. > > > > > > please correct me if I am wrong. and if this is the case, i am really > > > surprised how such a major change can be included without further > > > discussions. the current commit also shows that a new folder is created > > > for > > > every product, thus if a store had say 100K products, there will be 100K > > > additional folders created. I am not sure if this is at all expected or > > > desirable and before getting such major changes incorporated in the trunk, > > > it has not been discussed at all. > > > > > > please post your feedback. > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > Rohit > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > saanjhi.com > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1076507-deletes-the-images-folder-tp3343463p3343463.html > > > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
