On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 19:39 -0800, rohit wrote: > hi, > > i am also not sure of a few other practical issues. for eg. bulk uploading > of new products and images. currently i assume most use the the xml file to > import products data and then upload product images into 1 directory after > re-sizing. though it appears that the existing image file system can be > maintained, but does it make sense to have 2 different image file system, it > can obviously be an issue when doing back-up maintenance etc.
resizing can now be done by the image management system. > > The new image management contribution, does not seem complete as its not > working fully on the demo server, when i checked last 03/09/11. > Let me know what is not working by raising a jira issue. We plan to provide more information on the image management system in the next few weeks. > Also there are many store which run ofbiz on the trunk. though the trunk may > not be ideal for it, i still believe that the current structure should not > have been removed so fast as many using ofbiz risk accidently deleting all > their images. And instead of replacing the current directory structure a new > directly may have used until the code matured and acquired more acceptance. > There was an jira issue on this which was open for 10 days before committing. > Should it not be researched more, before it replaces t > he current structure. > > thanks > > Rohit > > > ----- > saanjhi.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-svn-commit-r1076507-deletes-the-images-folder-tp3343463p3347403.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. You might consider following the OFBiz mailing list directly, so you are better informed. -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
