I guess you think about
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/New+Features+Roadmap+-+Living+Document
Jacques
Le 01/10/2014 16:17, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Ron,
In the past there was a WIKI page decribing who was interested and who was
willing to work on what. I don't know whether that page still exists.
In the past we also had a system of having committers dedicated and
committed to a subset of the trunk. This should still be feasible. But for
that you need more committers. And to get more committers, this project
needs to solicit and accept more.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwhee...@artifact-software.com>
wrote:
A defined method of deciding what moves from the trunk to a release would
solve this.
Back to my previous comment about 1 person to test and 1 person to fix
bugs (could be the same person I suppose) would be a good starting minimum.
Ron
On 01/10/2014 2:56 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
The excuse of using PROJECTMgr in an older branch (12.x, the latest stable
release) and testing it against trunk and therefor not including it in a
release of a newer branch, is a lame one.
We are diligent about this, meaning that we do follow up against any
potential new release branch in order to be able to migrate to the newer
branch when there is something released.
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
The fact that someone is using it in an older branch and testing it in
trunk is not enough to guarantee it works well with 13.07; the trunk and
13.07 are very different codebases.
Additionally, the "projectmgr" component has 0 unit tests; I am not sure
about about its stability, but for example comments in code like the
following don't make me feel super confident:
<!-- temporary disabled because it caused a db lock with the
checkProjectMembership in projectpermission services -->
One more point to note: since the component has not been in the 13.07
branch, it didn't undergo the 1-year long stabilization phase where only
bug-fixes are backported: for example, one month ago, with revision
1618313, it was modified by a big commit to replace a series of
Freemarker
built-ins operation that we decided to not backport to 13.07 but only
keep
in the trunk.
Jacopo
On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:19 PM, Ron Wheeler <rwheeler@artifact-software.
com>
wrote:
So, as far as is known from Pierre's testing, there is no work required
to "stabilize and bug fix" the module prior to including it in 13.07.01?
Anyone else have any comments on the work required to include it in
13.07.01?
Ron
On 30/09/2014 5:13 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Ron, All,
We use the latest released branch, meaning 12.x. We don't expose our
customers to an unstable unreleased branch, that is still undergoing
significant changes.
But, we test our solutions against trunk. This enables us to identify
issues and register them in JIRA. And supply patches when workload
allows
it.
So yes, PROJECTMGR, SCRUM, etc work also in r13.x
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Ron Wheeler <
rwhee...@artifact-software.com> wrote:
Are you using it with a 12.04 or 13.xx?
What work is required to get it into 13.07?
Ron
On 30/09/2014 3:06 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Yes, I also have a vested interest in keeping this (PROJECTMGR) in
the
releases. It is part of our ORRTIZ:COM solution portfolio for our
customers
and we use it internally. And I have contributed to the improvement
of the
component.
We, at ORRTIZ:COM, even use an extension to the code base to ensure
that
it
also works for fixed price and internal projects. This extension
includes
generating the gl transactions regarding the cost price of each hour
registered regarding a project.
We also use the LDAP component to connect to our directory server
(Apache
Directory Server).
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Ron Wheeler
<rwheeler@artifact-software.
com
wrote:
It would be for me since it is one of the components that I want to
use.
Perhaps the more knowledgeable people might want to share a bit more
of
the background of the feature.
Is it in 12.xx.xx?
Is it currently in the 13.07 branch and therefor currently part of
the
13.07 versions that people have put in production or is it just in
the
trunk that people are putting into production?
What are the issues that need to be addressed before it is
"stabilized
and
bug fixed"?
Do any of these issues pose a significant risk to the stability of
the
rest of the functionality?
Is anyone using it in production? What are their opinions of the
state of
the code and the degree of risk?
Is anyone prepared to take on the task of getting it "stabilized and
bug
fixed" to a point where it can be safely included?
What is the estimate of the minimum effort required?
Ron
On 30/09/2014 9:58 AM, Mike wrote:
Why not deploy it as another hot-deploy component? Is it
considered a
"core" ERP component?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:59 AM, Pierre Smits <
pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Jacopo,
Back then there were already strong objections to excluding
components
from
the release. I recall that Hans also wanted to keep the SCRUM
component
in
the release, as well as there were proponents for BIRT and other
components.
These are good additions to the feature set of OFBiz and may be in
use
already by community members. It would be best that you solicit the
advice
of the entire community before a decision on excluding components
from
any
release is taken. This affects more participants in this project
than
just
you and the committers.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
Ok, got it.
The release process that the OFBiz community is following is
based on
a
feature freeze phase, that for the 13.07 branch started more than
one
year
ago, during which only bug fixes are backported.
This is done in order to stabilize the branch before an official
release
is done. Since the "projectmgr" component has never been part of
the
13.07
branch then it may be unsafe to include it now just before the
release
is
issued. It would be better to discuss its inclusion in the
upcoming
new
release branch where it could be stabilized and bug fixed.
Regards,
Jacopo
--
Ron Wheeler
President
Artifact Software Inc
email: rwhee...@artifact-software.com
skype: ronaldmwheeler
phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
