Fe de erratas: We use "partyIdFrom" instead of "partyId".
Gabriel Oberreuter wrote > For the record, at the end we implemented it like this: > > 1) Add new fields for entity Invoice: invoiceTypeSII and invoiceNumberSII. > invoiceTypeSII is defined by the Tax Authority (SII) in Chile and must be > implemented strictly by their specification. It is "similar" to ofbiz OOTB > invoiceTypeId (like SALES_INVOICE), but we decided that it was easier to > just implement a new field for this. invoiceNumberSII is the "folio": each > invoice issued in Chile must have a number (BigInteger), and those numbers > must be previously approved by SII before using them. (in fact, one has to > submit a request of a range of these folios to SII). > > 2) The ID of an Invoice (in Chile, generally speaking), is unique > nationwide if one consider: the ID of the company who issue the invoice > (the RUT, like the tax id in USA), the invoiceNumberSII, and the > invoiceTypeSII. So, for us to keep control of this uniqueness, we build > the invoiceId ourselves, using those 3 parameters: > invoiceId = > <partyId> > _ > <invoiceTypeSII> > _ > <invoiceNumberSII> > And for Party, we defined partyId as the RUT for each company in Chile. > > Hope this help someone else. -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/different-Invoice-types-with-same-Invoice-ID-range-Chilean-case-tp4672808p4676260.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
