Thanks Jacques ,

noted

regds
mallah.




On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Rajesh,
>
> Something you want to avoid in Confluence titles are special characters.
>
> Confluence does not handle them well and so create URLs for the page like
> yours below.
>
> I replaced & by and and the page is now at https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
> uence/display/OFBIZ/ScratchPad+for+collecting+Terms+and+Acronyms
>
> It's under Home wich is fine for now because it's only a temporary page.
> Later we would want to move it directly under
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Documentation
>
> HTH
>
> Jacques
>
>
>
> Le 29/08/2017 à 13:23, Rajesh Mallah a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for the kind words everyone.
>>
>> I already created a scratchpad
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=73635445
>>
>> it is my first page and i feel it got created in a wrong place.  :D
>>
>> request senior members to kindly relocate to a more suitable place.
>>
>> regds
>> mallah.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar <
>> shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 for the idea.
>>>
>>> Few More Suggestions:
>>>
>>> 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business processes
>>> or
>>> OFBiz components. For Example, inventory can have business terms like
>>> ATP,
>>> QOH, Back Order etc.
>>> 2) We can also incorporate business terminologies used in real world. So,
>>> people can relate those terms to the framework.
>>>
>>> Also, I would like to contribute to this glossary enrichment effort too.
>>>
>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>
>>> Shivangi Tanwar
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas <
>>> vyas.devansh...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I like the idea, +1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>> Devanshu Vyas.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi ,
>>>>>
>>>>> We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but
>>>>> the interpretation of the term may be  open or approximate to various
>>>>> stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We already have a glossary page
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Glossary
>>>>> But it is not very exhaustive yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was planning to go through the BPRB pages and prepare a list of all
>>>>> technical terms used in various pages for the purpose of enriching
>>>>> (extending) the glossary.
>>>>>
>>>>> I invite opinions on whether it is worth ?
>>>>>
>>>>> My Arguments in favour:
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) We need a common plane for definitions, if there is a disparity
>>>>>
>>>> between
>>>>
>>>>>        author's interpretation of a business term and the reader's or
>>>>>        reviewer's interpretation there shall be a communication gap.
>>>>>
>>>>> (2) For newbies it is a great resource  because it increases their
>>>>>        knowledge as well as ability of understanding more
>>>>>
>>>> articles/pages.
>>>
>>>> (3) consistency of articles: if all authors/contributors use the same
>>>>> terminology
>>>>>        then the content created by them shall relate to each other in a
>>>>>
>>>> more
>>>>
>>>>>        consistent manner.
>>>>>
>>>>> Implementation notes:
>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>> currently we have our glossary in a flat list format with is the
>>>>>
>>>> easiest
>>>
>>>> way
>>>>> to get started. However as the volume of terms and documentation
>>>>>
>>>> increases
>>>>
>>>>> we shall also require to organise the glossary in a more methodical
>>>>>
>>>> way.
>>>
>>>> Some of the relevant standards are W3C standards like SKOS [1]  ,
>>>>>
>>>> OWL[2].
>>>
>>>> I am not sure if confluence has components that allow organising
>>>>>
>>>> vocabulary
>>>>
>>>>> at this moment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if its' not there we can continue to enrich the Glossary / Vocab
>>>>>
>>>> in
>>>
>>>> a
>>>>
>>>>> simple
>>>>> manner (and later migrate/upgrade it).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> References:
>>>>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/intro
>>>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to