Thanks Rishi , I was actually looking for a total node list . no probs shall create one and your info shall quicken the traversal.
regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for the idea Rajesh. > > To answer your question, did you notice the child pages in the bottom? > > Here is quick reference; > Page: Customer Relationship Management (CRM) > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=73634368 > > > Page: E-commerce > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/E-commerce> > Page: Financial Accounting and Reporting > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/ > Financial+Accounting+and+Reporting> > Page: Human Resources Management > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/ > Human+Resources+Management> > Page: Manufacturing > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Manufacturing> > Page: Order Fulfillment Process > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/ > Order+Fulfillment+Process> > Page: Party <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Party> > Page: Product Information Management (PIM) > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=46631782 > > > Page: Sales Order Management > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Sales+Order+Management> > Page: Supply Chain Planning > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Supply+Chain+Planning> > Page: Warehouse Management > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Warehouse+Management> > > > Rishi Solanki > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > Direct: +91-9893287847 > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > www.hotwax.co > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > can someone conversant with confluence/wiki point me to list of *all* > pages > > created under > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/ > > Business+Process+Reference+Book > > > > else i have to create the list in the hard way (manually). > > > > regds > > mallah. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ankit Joshi < > > ankit.jo...@hotwaxsystems.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for the Idea. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > Ankit Joshi > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Shivangi , > > > > > > > > pls find replies inline. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < > > > > shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for the idea. > > > > > > > > > > Few More Suggestions: > > > > > > > > > > 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business > > processes > > > > or > > > > > OFBiz components. For Example, inventory can have business terms > like > > > > ATP, > > > > > QOH, Back Order etc. > > > > > 2) We can also incorporate business terminologies used in real > world. > > > So, > > > > > people can relate those terms to the framework. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both the above requirements are covered in a generic manner via > various > > > > relationship > > > > mechanism in SKOS system , I am hopeful confluence would have some > > > plugin > > > > that > > > > allows to leverage on that or some related technology or standard for > > > > maintaining vocabs > > > > and semantic relations between terms . ( I would explore at some > > point > > > ) > > > > > > > > SKOS article ( 2-3 mins reading time ). > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Knowledge_ > > > > Organization_System#Concepts > > > > > > > > I also observe that certain SKOS concept are already in use in > Catalog > > > > > > > Thesaurus application. > > > > > > > > Also, I would like to contribute to this glossary enrichment effort > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure ! & thanks , its being done as a Wiki page only. As a matter of > > > fact > > > > contribution and enrichment to definitions should done by banking > upon > > > > existing definitions and on knowledge which can be borrowed on > reliable > > > > sources . (no point re-inventing , definitions , we have to put it in > > > > context > > > > of ofbiz only ). > > > > > > > > > > > > regds > > > > mallah. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Shivangi Tanwar > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas < > > > > vyas.devansh...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I like the idea, +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > > Devanshu Vyas. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > > > > mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi , > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles > but > > > > > > > the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to > > > various > > > > > > > stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We already have a glossary page > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/ > Glossary > > > > > > > But it is not very exhaustive yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was planning to go through the BPRB pages and prepare a list > of > > > all > > > > > > > technical terms used in various pages for the purpose of > > enriching > > > > > > > (extending) the glossary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I invite opinions on whether it is worth ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My Arguments in favour: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (1) We need a common plane for definitions, if there is a > > disparity > > > > > > between > > > > > > > author's interpretation of a business term and the > reader's > > > or > > > > > > > reviewer's interpretation there shall be a communication > > gap. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (2) For newbies it is a great resource because it increases > > their > > > > > > > knowledge as well as ability of understanding more > > > > > articles/pages. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (3) consistency of articles: if all authors/contributors use > the > > > same > > > > > > > terminology > > > > > > > then the content created by them shall relate to each > other > > > in > > > > a > > > > > > more > > > > > > > consistent manner. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Implementation notes: > > > > > > > ---------------------------- > > > > > > > currently we have our glossary in a flat list format with is > the > > > > > easiest > > > > > > > way > > > > > > > to get started. However as the volume of terms and > documentation > > > > > > increases > > > > > > > we shall also require to organise the glossary in a more > > methodical > > > > > way. > > > > > > > Some of the relevant standards are W3C standards like SKOS > [1] , > > > > > OWL[2]. > > > > > > > I am not sure if confluence has components that allow > organising > > > > > > vocabulary > > > > > > > at this moment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even if its' not there we can continue to enrich the Glossary / > > > Vocab > > > > > in > > > > > > a > > > > > > > simple > > > > > > > manner (and later migrate/upgrade it). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/intro > > > > > > > [2] https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
