Hi Mr Maxim

> *I hope my description makes sense :)*
>
> Of course after several tests performed and conclusion, I had the same
result.

Thanks Mr Sebatian.

> *Il y a eu une autre discussion récente (plus technique) sur les
> différents modes/questions de regroupement sur cette liste de diffusion qui
> pourrait valoir la peine d'être lue :*
> *https://markmail.org/message/w55hh7ri2tmtlnvt*
> <https://markmail.org/message/w55hh7ri2tmtlnvt>
>
> *Surtout aussi autour de l'aspect des tests de performance et de la mesure
> des limites de capacité. Ainsi que comment optimiser l'utilisation du
> matériel/réseau lorsque la demande augmente.*
>


with the cluster mode, each node has an url/ip. Can we configure
hazelcast.xml or elsewhere something (unique url) users will access and
they will not know if they are redirected or not. Like when one node is
down, they will continue work but on nodes available (up) ? To make
availability service.

Kind regards,
Jeffrey.

Le mer. 8 sept. 2021 à 21:57, seba.wag...@gmail.com <seba.wag...@gmail.com>
a écrit :

> There was another recent (more technical) discussion about different
> clustering modes/questions on this mailing list that might be worth reading:
> https://markmail.org/message/w55hh7ri2tmtlnvt
>
> Especially also around the performance testing aspect
> and measuring capacity limits. As well as how to optimise the
> hardware/network usage when demand scales up.
>
> Thanks
> Sebastian
>
> Sebastian Wagner
> Director Arrakeen Solutions, OM-Hosting.com
> http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/
> https://om-hosting.com - Cloud & Server Hosting for HTML5
> Video-Conferencing OpenMeetings
>
> <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url>
> <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url>
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 03:27, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The current balancer is hardcoded and have no options for tuning (maybe
>> yet, ideas are welcome)
>>
>> The clustering is room-based
>> So if you have 2 nodes
>>
>> First user accessing the roomA will use node1,
>> all other users entering roomA will be redirected to node1
>>
>> If userB will enter roomB he/she will be redirected to node2
>> As well as all other users entering roomB
>>
>> if userC will enter roomC - the clustering logic will check
>> 1) if free nodes exists
>> 2) IF NOT: roomA and roomB capacity will be checked
>> Node with smaller total capacity will be used
>>
>> i.e. if roomA is personal room for max. 15 users and roomB is public room
>> with max. 150 users
>> roomC will be opened at node1
>>
>> I hope my description makes sense :)
>>
>> On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 09:46, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I have some questions about cluster of om
>>>
>>> In cluster mode, how is the redirection of users to the room appropriate
>>> for the server?
>>> What are the criteria?
>>> Are there any configurations to be made at the cluster level to know
>>> when it should redirect users ?
>>> We have which advantages with the cluster with 2 or more om ?
>>>
>>> thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Jeffrey
>>>
>>> Le jeu. 2 sept. 2021 à 06:29, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> In the scenario where the second instance is not turned off manually.
>>>> I.e. they are in a meeting and suddenly he had a crash users connected to
>>>> this instance will not have access to the application (i.e. the server will
>>>> be offline)
>>>>
>>>> Le jeu. 2 sept. 2021 à 03:17, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Jeffrey,
>>>>>
>>>>> since taking cluster node offline is manual process I would expect it
>>>>> will happen while there will be no load
>>>>> I can imagine no mechanism to more users to other node
>>>>>
>>>>> might require some "Cluster admin" or something like this ....
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 01:07, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi dear all,
>>>>>> Need help - clarifications on setting up cluster - OM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When two OM instances are in cluster mode, is it normal that if one
>>>>>> is turned off, the meeting (access) is no longer available for the users
>>>>>> connected to this instance?
>>>>>> Isn't there a way to switch them automatically to the instance that
>>>>>> is active?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Jeffrey
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mar. 31 août 2021 à 06:12, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi dear all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When two OM instances are in cluster mode, is it normal that if one
>>>>>>> is turned off, the meeting (access) is no longer available for the users
>>>>>>> connected to this instance?
>>>>>>> Isn't there a way to switch them to the instance that is
>>>>>>> automatically active?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Jeffrey
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Maxim
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Maxim
>>
>

Reply via email to