Okay, I see. Thanks Mr Maxim Best Regards
Le ven. 24 sept. 2021 à 05:08, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 19:43, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Mr Maxim >> >>> *I hope my description makes sense :)* >>> >>> Of course after several tests performed and conclusion, I had the same >> result. >> >> Thanks Mr Sebatian. >> >>> *Il y a eu une autre discussion récente (plus technique) sur les >>> différents modes/questions de regroupement sur cette liste de diffusion qui >>> pourrait valoir la peine d'être lue :* >>> *https://markmail.org/message/w55hh7ri2tmtlnvt* >>> <https://markmail.org/message/w55hh7ri2tmtlnvt> >>> >>> *Surtout aussi autour de l'aspect des tests de performance et de la >>> mesure des limites de capacité. Ainsi que comment optimiser l'utilisation >>> du matériel/réseau lorsque la demande augmente.* >>> >> >> >> with the cluster mode, each node has an url/ip. Can we configure >> hazelcast.xml or elsewhere something (unique url) users will access and >> they will not know if they are redirected or not. Like when one node is >> down, they will continue work but on nodes available (up) ? To make >> availability service. >> > > This *might be* possible, but will complicate the configuration > And will require to change source code and recompile > > >> Kind regards, >> Jeffrey. >> >> Le mer. 8 sept. 2021 à 21:57, seba.wag...@gmail.com < >> seba.wag...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >>> There was another recent (more technical) discussion about different >>> clustering modes/questions on this mailing list that might be worth reading: >>> https://markmail.org/message/w55hh7ri2tmtlnvt >>> >>> Especially also around the performance testing aspect >>> and measuring capacity limits. As well as how to optimise the >>> hardware/network usage when demand scales up. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Sebastian >>> >>> Sebastian Wagner >>> Director Arrakeen Solutions, OM-Hosting.com >>> http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/ >>> https://om-hosting.com - Cloud & Server Hosting for HTML5 >>> Video-Conferencing OpenMeetings >>> >>> <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url> >>> <https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 03:27, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The current balancer is hardcoded and have no options for tuning (maybe >>>> yet, ideas are welcome) >>>> >>>> The clustering is room-based >>>> So if you have 2 nodes >>>> >>>> First user accessing the roomA will use node1, >>>> all other users entering roomA will be redirected to node1 >>>> >>>> If userB will enter roomB he/she will be redirected to node2 >>>> As well as all other users entering roomB >>>> >>>> if userC will enter roomC - the clustering logic will check >>>> 1) if free nodes exists >>>> 2) IF NOT: roomA and roomB capacity will be checked >>>> Node with smaller total capacity will be used >>>> >>>> i.e. if roomA is personal room for max. 15 users and roomB is public >>>> room with max. 150 users >>>> roomC will be opened at node1 >>>> >>>> I hope my description makes sense :) >>>> >>>> On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 09:46, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I have some questions about cluster of om >>>>> >>>>> In cluster mode, how is the redirection of users to the room >>>>> appropriate for the server? >>>>> What are the criteria? >>>>> Are there any configurations to be made at the cluster level to know >>>>> when it should redirect users ? >>>>> We have which advantages with the cluster with 2 or more om ? >>>>> >>>>> thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Jeffrey >>>>> >>>>> Le jeu. 2 sept. 2021 à 06:29, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com> >>>>> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> In the scenario where the second instance is not turned off manually. >>>>>> I.e. they are in a meeting and suddenly he had a crash users connected to >>>>>> this instance will not have access to the application (i.e. the server >>>>>> will >>>>>> be offline) >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeu. 2 sept. 2021 à 03:17, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Jeffrey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> since taking cluster node offline is manual process I would expect >>>>>>> it will happen while there will be no load >>>>>>> I can imagine no mechanism to more users to other node >>>>>>> >>>>>>> might require some "Cluster admin" or something like this .... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 01:07, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi dear all, >>>>>>>> Need help - clarifications on setting up cluster - OM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When two OM instances are in cluster mode, is it normal that if one >>>>>>>> is turned off, the meeting (access) is no longer available for the >>>>>>>> users >>>>>>>> connected to this instance? >>>>>>>> Isn't there a way to switch them automatically to the instance that >>>>>>>> is active? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> Jeffrey >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le mar. 31 août 2021 à 06:12, Aom Jeff Root <aomjeff.r...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi dear all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When two OM instances are in cluster mode, is it normal that if >>>>>>>>> one is turned off, the meeting (access) is no longer available for the >>>>>>>>> users connected to this instance? >>>>>>>>> Isn't there a way to switch them to the instance that is >>>>>>>>> automatically active? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> Jeffrey >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Maxim >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Maxim >>>> >>> > > -- > Best regards, > Maxim >
