Well I'd say it's the only option left to some of us to use Phoenix in our clients/companies. Most of them only go for commercial distributions of Hadoop for obvious reasons and cannot afford keeping up with frequent platform update. In our case each platform migration is bigger (in terms of effort etc) than some projects.
Cloudera stopped porting it to CDH because of strategic reasons. Basically they say that Kudu does everything that Phoenix do... . Marketing strategy I guess. And we cannot stay with Phoenix 4.5 and CDH 5.5 (and no bugfixes) forever. In the other hand Hortonworks already keeps Phoenix within their own distribution so in this case the vendor itself sees strategic advantage on this. As long as I work for the same company I'll have to port Phoenix to CDH. So I could help with it guys. Maybe my only issue to publish the parcels is getting web hosting for them. On 27 Oct 2017 06:35, "James Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote: > This is great, Pedro. Thanks so much for porting everything over. Would it > make sense to try to have a CDH compatible release with each Phoenix > release? Who would sign up to do this? Same question for HDP releases. > > Thanks, > James > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Pedro Boado <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Sorry, it s provided "as is" . Try a "mvn clean package -D >> skipTests=true" . >> >> And grab the parcel from phoenix-parcel/target >> >> On 26 Oct 2017 22:21, "Flavio Pompermaier" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> And how do you use the parcel? Where it is generated?any documentation >>> about this? >>> >>> On 26 Oct 2017 20:37, "Pedro Boado" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've done it for Phoenix 4.11 and CDH 5.11.2 based on previous work >>>> from chiastic-security. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/pboado/phoenix-for-cloudera/tree/4.11-cdh5.11.2 >>>> >>>> All integrations tests running, and I've added a parcel module for >>>> parcel-generation in rhel6. >>>> >>>> Contributions are welcome for supporting other parcel formats. >>>> >>>> I've also tried to compile Phoenix 4.12 but some IT are failing and I >>>> haven't looked further into them yet. >>>> >>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:42, "Flavio Pompermaier" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I could give it a try...any reference about it?where can I find this >>>> latest parcel you produced? Any feedback from Cloudera? >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26 Oct 2017 18:38, "Jean-Marc Spaggiari" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> It is. The parcel is not just a packaging of the Phoenix code into a >>>> different format. It requires some modifications. However, it's doable... >>>> Andrew applied those modifications on a later version and we packaged it >>>> into a Parcel. So it's definitely doable. Might be interesting to do that >>>> for the last version, but will require some efforts... >>>> >>>> 2017-10-26 12:07 GMT-04:00 Flavio Pompermaier <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Looking at [1] they say that "Attempt to run the official >>>>> apache-phoenix-4.10.0-HBase-1.2 on CDH 5.12 failed due to tight >>>>> coupling of CLAB_PHOENIX with HBase, and what looks like subtle API >>>>> incompatibilities between Phoenix-embedded and CDH HBase classes. >>>>> Namespace mapping partially worked, however". Is that true? >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://community.cloudera.com/t5/Cloudera-Labs/Apache-P >>>>> hoenix-Support-for-CDH-5-8-x-5-9x-5-10-x-5-11-x/m-p/58729/hi >>>>> ghlight/true#M378 >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'll take care of it ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25 Oct 2017 23:45, "Sergey Soldatov" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Flavio, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It looks like you need to ask the vendor, not the community about >>>>>>> their plan for further releases. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Sergey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi to all, >>>>>>>> the latest Phoenix Cloudera parcel I can see is 4.7...any plan to >>>>>>>> release a newer version? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd need at least Phoenix 4.9..anyone using it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Flavio >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
