>From: Torsten Krah [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >The question would be - as the second run is really useless - how to >identify annotated tiger beans. >If they can be identified (dont know if this is possible and how to do >it yet), than the code in run two can be fixed to do what the comment >does want to do, remove them, instead of removing the rest completely. >
I'm thinking that we could just remove that bit of logic because the web container should fire the ServletRequestListener [1] regardless? However, there might be a funky case that resulted in this logic in the PhaseListener - not sure. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/shale/framework/trunk/shale-view/src/main/java/org/apache/shale/view/faces/LifecycleListener.java?view=markup >Torsten Gary
--- Begin Message ---The question would be - as the second run is really useless - how to identify annotated tiger beans. If they can be identified (dont know if this is possible and how to do it yet), than the code in run two can be fixed to do what the comment does want to do, remove them, instead of removing the rest completely. Torsten Am Dienstag, den 22.05.2007, 15:41 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Please fix the bug SHALE-409. > > > > Regards > > Mario Buonopane > > > > > > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, > proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in > error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any > other use of the email by you is prohibited.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--- End Message ---
