Thank you, Denny. May I interpret your comment as a request to support multiple channels in ASF too?
> because it would allow us to create multiple channels for different topics Any other reasons? Dongjoon. On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 5:31 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote: > I do think creating a new Slack channel would be helpful because it would > allow us to create multiple channels for different topics - streaming, > graph, ML, etc. > > We would need a volunteer core to maintain it so we can keep the spirit > and letter of ASF / code of conduct. I’d be glad to volunteer to keep this > active. > > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 16:46 Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Shall we summarize the discussion so far? >> >> To sum up, "ASF Slack" vs "3rd-party Slack" was the real background to >> initiate this thread instead of "Slack" vs "Mailing list"? >> >> If ASF Slack provides what you need, is it better than creating a >> new Slack channel? >> >> Or, is there another reason for us to create a new Slack channel? >> >> Dongjoon. >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 3:27 PM Mich Talebzadeh <mich.talebza...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I agree, whatever individual sentiments are. >>> >>> Mich Talebzadeh, >>> Lead Solutions Architect/Engineering Lead >>> Palantir Technologies Limited >>> >>> >>> view my Linkedin profile >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>> >>> >>> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >>> >>> >>> >>> *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility for >>> any loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property which may >>> arise from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly >>> disclaimed. The author will in no case be liable for any monetary damages >>> arising from such loss, damage or destruction. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 at 23:21, Jungtaek Lim <kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Just to be clear, if there is no strong volunteer to make the new >>>> community channel stay active, I'd probably be OK to not fork the channel. >>>> You can see a strong counter example from #spark channel in ASF. It is the >>>> place where there are only questions and promos but zero answers. I see >>>> volunteers here demanding for another channel, so I want to see us go with >>>> the most preferred way for these volunteers. >>>> >>>> User mailing list does not go in a good shape. I hope we give another >>>> try with recent technology to see whether we can gain traction - if we >>>> fail, the user mailing list will still be there. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 7:04 AM Jungtaek Lim < >>>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The number of subscribers doesn't give any meaningful value. Please >>>>> look into the number of mails being sent to the list. >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?user@spark.apache.org >>>>> The latest month there were more than 200 emails being sent was Feb >>>>> 2022, more than a year ago. It was more than 1k in 2016, and more than 2k >>>>> in 2015 and earlier. >>>>> Let's face the fact. User mailing list is dying, even before we start >>>>> discussion about alternative communication methods. >>>>> >>>>> Users never go with the way if it's just because PMC members (or ASF) >>>>> have preference. They are going with the way they are convenient. >>>>> >>>>> Same applies here - if ASF Slack requires a restricted invitation >>>>> mechanism then it won't work. Looks like there is a link for an >>>>> invitation, >>>>> but we are also talking about the cost as well. >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Slack+Guest+Invites >>>>> As long as we are being serious about the cost, I don't think we are >>>>> going to land in the way "users" are convenient. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 4:59 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As Mich Talebzadeh pointed out, Apache Spark has an official Slack >>>>>> channel. >>>>>> >>>>>> > It's unavoidable if "users" prefer to use an alternative >>>>>> communication mechanism rather than the user mailing list. >>>>>> >>>>>> The following is the number of people in the official channels. >>>>>> >>>>>> - user@spark.apache.org has 4519 subscribers. >>>>>> - d...@spark.apache.org has 3149 subscribers. >>>>>> - ASF Official Slack channel has 602 subscribers. >>>>>> >>>>>> May I ask if the users prefer to use the ASF Official Slack channel >>>>>> than the user mailing list? >>>>>> >>>>>> Dongjoon. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:10 PM Jungtaek Lim < >>>>>> kabhwan.opensou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm reading through the page "Briefing: The Apache Way", and in the >>>>>>> section of "Open Communications", restriction of communication inside >>>>>>> ASF >>>>>>> INFRA (mailing list) is more about code and decision-making. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/#what-makes-the-apache-way-so-hard-to-define >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's unavoidable if "users" prefer to use an alternative >>>>>>> communication mechanism rather than the user mailing list. Before Stack >>>>>>> Overflow days, there had been a meaningful number of questions around >>>>>>> user@. >>>>>>> It's just impossible to let them go back and post to the user mailing >>>>>>> list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We just need to make sure it is not the purpose of employing Slack >>>>>>> to move all discussions about developments, direction of the project, >>>>>>> etc >>>>>>> which must happen in dev@/private@. The purpose of Slack thread >>>>>>> here does not seem to aim to serve the purpose. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:00 AM Mich Talebzadeh < >>>>>>> mich.talebza...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good discussions and proposals.all around. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have used slack in anger on a customer site before. For small and >>>>>>>> medium size groups it is good and affordable. Alternatives have been >>>>>>>> suggested as well so those who like investigative search can agree and >>>>>>>> come >>>>>>>> up with a freebie one. >>>>>>>> I am inclined to agree with Bjorn that this slack has more social >>>>>>>> dimensions than the mailing list. It is akin to a sports club using >>>>>>>> WhatsApp groups for communication. Remember we were originally looking >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> space for webinars, including Spark on Linkedin that Denney Lee >>>>>>>> suggested. >>>>>>>> I think Slack and mailing groups can coexist happily. On a more serious >>>>>>>> note, when I joined the user group back in 2015-2016, there was a lot >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> traffic. Currently we hardly get many mails daily <> less than 5. So >>>>>>>> having >>>>>>>> a slack type medium may improve members participation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> so +1 for me as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mich Talebzadeh, >>>>>>>> Lead Solutions Architect/Engineering Lead >>>>>>>> Palantir Technologies Limited >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> view my Linkedin profile >>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all responsibility >>>>>>>> for any loss, damage or destruction of data or any other property >>>>>>>> which may >>>>>>>> arise from relying on this email's technical content is explicitly >>>>>>>> disclaimed. The author will in no case be liable for any monetary >>>>>>>> damages >>>>>>>> arising from such loss, damage or destruction. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 22:19, Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To Shani’s point, there are multiple OSS projects that use the >>>>>>>>> free Slack version - top of mind include Delta, Presto, Flink, Trino, >>>>>>>>> Datahub, MLflow, etc. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 14:15 <shani.alis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think we should remain on a free program in slack. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In my option the free program is more then enough, the only down >>>>>>>>>> side is we could only see the last 90 days messages. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> From what I know the Airflow community (which has strong active >>>>>>>>>> community in slack) also use the free program (You can tell by the >>>>>>>>>> 90 days >>>>>>>>>> limit notice in their workspace). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You can find the pricing and features comparison between the >>>>>>>>>> slack programs here <https://slack.com/intl/en-gb/pricing> . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have a great day, >>>>>>>>>> Shani >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 30 Mar 2023, at 23:38, Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for flagging the concern Dongjoon, I was not aware of the >>>>>>>>>> discussion - but I can understand the concern. >>>>>>>>>> Would be great if you or Matei could update the thread on the >>>>>>>>>> result of deliberations, once it reaches a logical consensus: before >>>>>>>>>> we set >>>>>>>>>> up official policy around it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Mridul >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:23 PM Bjørn Jørgensen < >>>>>>>>>> bjornjorgen...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I like the idea of having a talk channel. It can make it easier >>>>>>>>>>> for everyone to say hello. Or to dare to ask about small or big >>>>>>>>>>> matters >>>>>>>>>>> that you would not have dared to ask about before on mailing lists. >>>>>>>>>>> But then there is the price and what is the best for an open >>>>>>>>>>> source project. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The price for using slack is expensive. >>>>>>>>>>> Right now for those that have join spark slack >>>>>>>>>>> $8.75 USD >>>>>>>>>>> 72 members >>>>>>>>>>> 1 month >>>>>>>>>>> $630 USD >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://app.slack.com/plans/T04URTRBZ1R/checkout/form?entry_point=hero_banner_upgrade_cta&s=2 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And they - slack does not have an option for open source >>>>>>>>>>> projects. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There seems to be some alternatives for open source software. I >>>>>>>>>>> have not tried it. >>>>>>>>>>> Like https://www.rocket.chat/blog/slack-open-source-alternatives >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <image.png> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> rocket chat is open source >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> tor. 30. mar. 2023 kl. 18:54 skrev Mich Talebzadeh < >>>>>>>>>>> mich.talebza...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dongjoon >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> to your points if I may >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Do you have any reference from other official ASF-related >>>>>>>>>>>> Slack channels? >>>>>>>>>>>> No, I don't have any reference from other official >>>>>>>>>>>> ASF-related Slack channels because I don't think that matters. >>>>>>>>>>>> However, I >>>>>>>>>>>> stand corrected >>>>>>>>>>>> - To be clear, I intentionally didn't refer to any specific >>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list because we didn't set up any rule here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>> fair enough >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> going back to your original point >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ..There is a concern expressed by ASF board because recent >>>>>>>>>>>> Slack activities created an isolated silo outside of ASF mailing >>>>>>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>>>>>> archive... >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, there are activities on Spark and indeed other open >>>>>>>>>>>> source software everywhere. One way or other they do help getting >>>>>>>>>>>> community >>>>>>>>>>>> (inside the user groups and other) to get interested and involved. >>>>>>>>>>>> Slack >>>>>>>>>>>> happens to be one of them. >>>>>>>>>>>> I am of the opinion that creating such silos is already a >>>>>>>>>>>> reality and we ought to be pragmatic. Unless there is an >>>>>>>>>>>> overriding reason, >>>>>>>>>>>> we should embrace it as slack can co-exist with the other mailing >>>>>>>>>>>> lists and >>>>>>>>>>>> channels like linkedin etc. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hope this clarifies my position >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mich Talebzadeh, >>>>>>>>>>>> Lead Solutions Architect/Engineering Lead >>>>>>>>>>>> Palantir Technologies Limited >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> view my Linkedin profile >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all >>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility for any loss, damage or destruction of data or any >>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>> property which may arise from relying on this email's technical >>>>>>>>>>>> content is >>>>>>>>>>>> explicitly disclaimed. The author will in no case be liable for any >>>>>>>>>>>> monetary damages arising from such loss, damage or destruction. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 17:28, Dongjoon Hyun < >>>>>>>>>>>> dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To Mich. >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Do you have any reference from other official ASF-related >>>>>>>>>>>>> Slack channels? >>>>>>>>>>>>> - To be clear, I intentionally didn't refer to any specific >>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list because we didn't set up any rule here yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To Xiao. I understand what you mean. That's the reason why I >>>>>>>>>>>>> added Matei from your side. >>>>>>>>>>>>> > I did not see an objection from the ASF board. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There is on-going discussion about the communication channels >>>>>>>>>>>>> outside ASF email which is specifically concerning Slack. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please hold on any official action for this topic. We will >>>>>>>>>>>>> know how to support it seamlessly. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dongjoon. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 9:21 AM Xiao Li <gatorsm...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Dongjoon, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The other communities (e.g., Pinot, Druid, Flink) created >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their own Slack workspaces last year. I did not see an objection >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ASF board. At the same time, Slack workspaces are very popular >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and useful >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in most non-ASF open source communities. TBH, we are kind of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> late. I think >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can do the same in our community? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can follow the guide when the ASF has an official process >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for ASF archiving. Since our PMC are the owner of the slack >>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace, we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can make a change based on the policy. WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xiao >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月30日周四 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 09:03写道： >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Xiao and all. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (cc Matei) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please hold on the vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a concern expressed by ASF board because recent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slack activities created an isolated silo outside of ASF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archive. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We need to establish a way to embrace it back to ASF archive >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before starting anything official. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bests, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dongjoon. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 11:32 PM Xiao Li < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gatorsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + @d...@spark.apache.org <d...@spark.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a good idea. The other Apache projects (e.g., >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pinot, Druid, Flink) have created their own dedicated Slack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspaces for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> faster communication. We can do the same in Apache Spark. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace will be maintained by the Apache Spark PMC. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose to initiate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a vote for the creation of a new Apache Spark Slack workspace. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sound good? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xiao >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mich Talebzadeh <mich.talebza...@gmail.com> 于2023年3月28日周二 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 07:07写道： >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I created one at slack called pyspark >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mich Talebzadeh, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lead Solutions Architect/Engineering Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Palantir Technologies Limited >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> view my Linkedin profile >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mich-talebzadeh-ph-d-5205b2/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://en.everybodywiki.com/Mich_Talebzadeh >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Disclaimer:* Use it at your own risk. Any and all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility for any loss, damage or destruction of data or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> property which may arise from relying on this email's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical content is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explicitly disclaimed. The author will in no case be liable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monetary damages arising from such loss, damage or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> destruction. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 03:52, asma zgolli < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zgollia...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 good idea, I d like to join as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 28 mars 2023 à 04:09, Winston Lai < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weiruanl...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let us know when the channel is created. I'd like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to join :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank You & Best Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Winston Lai >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 28, 2023 9:43:08 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Cc:* keen <kee...@gmx.net>; user@spark.apache.org < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user@spark.apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Slack for PySpark users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 I think this is a great idea! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 6:24 PM Hyukjin Kwon < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, actually I think we should better have a slack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> channel so we can easily discuss with users and developers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 03:08, keen <kee...@gmx.net> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really like *Slack *as communication channel for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tech community. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a Slack workspace for *delta lake users* ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://go.delta.io/slack) that I enjoy a lot. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is something similar for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PySpark users. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not, would there be anything wrong with creating a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new Slack workspace for PySpark users? (when explicitly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioning that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is *not* officially part of Apache Spark)? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Asma ZGOLLI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ph.D. in Big Data - Applied Machine Learning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Bjørn Jørgensen >>>>>>>>>>> Vestre Aspehaug 4 >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Vestre+Aspehaug+4?entry=gmail&source=g>, >>>>>>>>>>> 6010 Ålesund >>>>>>>>>>> Norge >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +47 480 94 297 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
