Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara We could implement a "most specific take a precedence along the path" policy (though I don't know how ATM :) ), could you please file an issue on jira [1]? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW On 19 March 2012 08:49, Mounir Benzid <m...@meetingmasters.de> wrote: > Am 18.03.2012 20:15, schrieb Maurizio Cucchiara: > > I don't know how to get this work with annotations, but it looks like that >> it works using xml (you can control greediness sorting by more specific >> expression) >> >> Twitter >> :http://www.twitter.com/m_**cucchiara<http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara> >> G+ >> :https://plus.google.com/**107903711540963855921<https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921> >> Linkedin >> :http://www.linkedin.com/in/**mauriziocucchiara<http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara> >> >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> > It could be sufficiant if the order of the regex pattern in the java > class file matters or > alternativly one should be able to make the pattern matcher itself > nongreedy by using the ? op. > I'm not sure though weather the ? notation will work this way. > > > Mounir > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > user-unsubscribe@struts.**apache.org<user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
