2013/6/22 Litman, Bruno <blit...@alabamainteractive.org>: > We are also experiencing issues with tags and theme files, we are upgrading > many applications from 2.3.4.1 to 2.3.14.3 > I am not sure if this is related - if not and if I need to start a new > discussion please let me know and accept my apology. > > 1/ > > We previously always coded forms as : > <s:form action="login" namespace="/">.... > Now randomly, this fails to generate the proper action url in the html (it is > missing the '.action', which results in a 404 once you post the form) > > The only workaround we have found so far is to add the '.action' suffix to > the s:form's action attribute. Before it was always added for us by struts. > So now we are having success with > <s:form action="login.action" namespace="/">... > > Is this expected behavior? Did this change recently? 2.3.4.1 is not so > ancient..
No, it isn't - mainly a bug - Struts should add suffix for you, you basically use the same action names as defined in struts.xml. This is very strange, I have just tested with struts2-blank on Jetty and suffix was there. Could you share more details about the config? > 2/ > > We are trying to replace the "required" attribute in the textfields with > "requiredLabel" without success. Was the xhtml theme's ftl file > "controlheader_core" updated to reflect the changes in the struts-tags.tld > (requiredLabel replaced required)? You are right, it is bug :\ Please fill an issue > Also, it seems applications are randomly serving ftl files from other > applications' theme folders with the same name. > This was demonstrated by modifying something obvious in one application's > ftl file (displaying some text next to a text field's label), and the effect > can be seen randomly on other applications which shouldn’t even see that > application's template folder (the themes are however named the same in both > applications) > I am only able to make the "requiredLabel" attribute work if placed in a > <s:param> tag as opposed to being just an attribute of the s:textfield tag, > but even so it is still not always using the same ftl files (however always > from similarly named themes placed inside each application) > > This is extremely confusing. Is FreeMarker caching files independently of the > application? Is the app container interfering with caching? (We are using > Resin 4.0.36) Hmmm... very strange behaviour, it will be hard to find the source of the problem. Maybe it is related to new ContainerHolder and how Resin is managing threads - but I'm not sure :\ Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
