Technically it already *is* part of S2 in the MethodFilterInterceptor class.
I'm not particularly excited about an annotation to skip Prepareable, but I'm not fundamentally opposed, either. Dave On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sreekanth S. Nair < sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > The idea is precisely good, thats what i wanted but do you think it will be > a good addition to strust2 framework by any chance then i hope the same > could be a part of struts2 framework itself. > > -- > Thanks & Regards > Srikanth > Software Developer > -------------------------------- > eGovernments Foundations > www.egovernments.org > Mob : 9980078913 > -------------------------------- > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > If you'll note in the docs the interceptor extends > MethodFilterInterceptor, > > so one trivial way to fix it is to configure the interceptor for the > > specific actions. > > > > Another option is to take the existing interceptor and extend it to > support > > something like annotations, a naming convention, etc. to skip either > > specific or general methods. > > > > E.g., if your validation call was always named the same thing, you could > > either configure the interceptor package-wide, or change the prepare > > interceptor to always skip preparation for methods annotated with > > @DoNotPrepare, etc. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > > > > > Too many methods :( needs its own prepare then. > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Regards > > > Srikanth > > > Software Developer > > > -------------------------------- > > > eGovernments Foundations > > > www.egovernments.org > > > Mob : 9980078913 > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Did you try `prepareWhateverMethodThatNeedsPrepare`? I don't recall > if > > > that > > > > works or not. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > No i can't do that, because that Action contains other method which > > > needs > > > > > Prepare, the only option i can think of is moving these Ajax method > > to > > > > some > > > > > other Action which is not extending Prepareable. But as of now its > > very > > > > > hard because so many resources i have to change. Any other idea? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > > Srikanth > > > > > Software Developer > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > eGovernments Foundations > > > > > www.egovernments.org > > > > > Mob : 9980078913 > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Paul Benedict < > pbened...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Have you thought of removing the "implements Preparable" from > your > > > > > action? > > > > > > That will do it. > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2013 6:12 AM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < > > > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suppose i need to call any ajax validation on the same Action, > it > > > > > > > unnecessarily run in to prepare. Where that ajax validation > > doesn't > > > > > > > required to call prepare. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > > > > Srikanth > > > > > > > Software Developer > > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > eGovernments Foundations > > > > > > > www.egovernments.org > > > > > > > Mob : 9980078913 > > > > > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Paul Benedict < > > > pbened...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you want to bypass it? > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2013 3:47 AM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < > > > > > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any annotation available to bypass prepare method > > > while > > > > > > > invoking > > > > > > > > > certain methods, just like @skipvalidation > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > > > > > > Srikanth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > e: davelnew...@gmail.com > > > > m: 908-380-8699 > > > > s: davelnewton_skype > > > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> > > > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> > > > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> > > > > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > e: davelnew...@gmail.com > > m: 908-380-8699 > > s: davelnewton_skype > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> > > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton> > > > -- e: davelnew...@gmail.com m: 908-380-8699 s: davelnewton_skype t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton>
