Attaching SkippablePrepareInterceptor and SkipPrepare Annotation Code, I hope it may helpful for other who have similar requirement. Struts2 can include it, if strust2 developer think its worthy.
-- Thanks & Regards Srikanth On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: > Hi Chris, i already answered for the same, we have more than 50 modules > and 1000 of Action classes. Doing what you say is not an easy task for us > instead of adding a simple annotation on those method. > > -- > Thanks & Regards > Srikanth > Software Developer > -------------------------------- > eGovernments Foundations > www.egovernments.org > Mob : 9980078913 > -------------------------------- > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Chris Pratt <thechrispr...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Why not just take your action and move the Preparable interface and >> prepare() function to a subclass with the methods that require it's >> support? Seems a lot easier than creating more infrastructure. >> (*Chris*) >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >> sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >> >> > Okay, i can create one for mine, leaving to struts2 framework developer >> > whether strust2 need an annotation like @SkipPrepare. Thanks for your >> > support Dave. >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks & Regards >> > Srikanth >> > Software Developer >> > -------------------------------- >> > eGovernments Foundations >> > www.egovernments.org >> > Mob : 9980078913 >> > -------------------------------- >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Technically it already *is* part of S2 in the MethodFilterInterceptor >> > > class. >> > > >> > > I'm not particularly excited about an annotation to skip Prepareable, >> but >> > > I'm not fundamentally opposed, either. >> > > >> > > Dave >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >> > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > > The idea is precisely good, thats what i wanted but do you think it >> > will >> > > be >> > > > a good addition to strust2 framework by any chance then i hope the >> same >> > > > could be a part of struts2 framework itself. >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Thanks & Regards >> > > > Srikanth >> > > > Software Developer >> > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > eGovernments Foundations >> > > > www.egovernments.org >> > > > Mob : 9980078913 >> > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > If you'll note in the docs the interceptor extends >> > > > MethodFilterInterceptor, >> > > > > so one trivial way to fix it is to configure the interceptor for >> the >> > > > > specific actions. >> > > > > >> > > > > Another option is to take the existing interceptor and extend it >> to >> > > > support >> > > > > something like annotations, a naming convention, etc. to skip >> either >> > > > > specific or general methods. >> > > > > >> > > > > E.g., if your validation call was always named the same thing, you >> > > could >> > > > > either configure the interceptor package-wide, or change the >> prepare >> > > > > interceptor to always skip preparation for methods annotated with >> > > > > @DoNotPrepare, etc. >> > > > > >> > > > > Dave >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >> > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Too many methods :( needs its own prepare then. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > Thanks & Regards >> > > > > > Srikanth >> > > > > > Software Developer >> > > > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > > > eGovernments Foundations >> > > > > > www.egovernments.org >> > > > > > Mob : 9980078913 >> > > > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dave Newton < >> > davelnew...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Did you try `prepareWhateverMethodThatNeedsPrepare`? I don't >> > recall >> > > > if >> > > > > > that >> > > > > > > works or not. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Sreekanth S. Nair < >> > > > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > No i can't do that, because that Action contains other >> method >> > > which >> > > > > > needs >> > > > > > > > Prepare, the only option i can think of is moving these Ajax >> > > method >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > some >> > > > > > > > other Action which is not extending Prepareable. But as of >> now >> > > its >> > > > > very >> > > > > > > > hard because so many resources i have to change. Any other >> > idea? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards >> > > > > > > > Srikanth >> > > > > > > > Software Developer >> > > > > > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > > > > > eGovernments Foundations >> > > > > > > > www.egovernments.org >> > > > > > > > Mob : 9980078913 >> > > > > > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Paul Benedict < >> > > > pbened...@apache.org >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Have you thought of removing the "implements Preparable" >> from >> > > > your >> > > > > > > > action? >> > > > > > > > > That will do it. >> > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2013 6:12 AM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < >> > > > > > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Suppose i need to call any ajax validation on the same >> > > Action, >> > > > it >> > > > > > > > > > unnecessarily run in to prepare. Where that ajax >> validation >> > > > > doesn't >> > > > > > > > > > required to call prepare. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards >> > > > > > > > > > Srikanth >> > > > > > > > > > Software Developer >> > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > > > > > > > eGovernments Foundations >> > > > > > > > > > www.egovernments.org >> > > > > > > > > > Mob : 9980078913 >> > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Paul Benedict < >> > > > > > pbened...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Why would you want to bypass it? >> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 26, 2013 3:47 AM, "Sreekanth S. Nair" < >> > > > > > > > > > > sreekanth.n...@egovernments.org> wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any annotation available to bypass prepare >> > > method >> > > > > > while >> > > > > > > > > > invoking >> > > > > > > > > > > > certain methods, just like @skipvalidation >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards >> > > > > > > > > > > > Srikanth >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > e: davelnew...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > m: 908-380-8699 >> > > > > > > s: davelnewton_skype >> > > > > > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> >> > > > > > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> >> > > > > > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> >> > > > > > > so: Dave Newton < >> > http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > e: davelnew...@gmail.com >> > > > > m: 908-380-8699 >> > > > > s: davelnewton_skype >> > > > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> >> > > > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> >> > > > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> >> > > > > so: Dave Newton < >> http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > e: davelnew...@gmail.com >> > > m: 908-380-8699 >> > > s: davelnewton_skype >> > > t: @dave_newton <https://twitter.com/dave_newton> >> > > b: Bucky Bits <http://buckybits.blogspot.com/> >> > > g: davelnewton <https://github.com/davelnewton> >> > > so: Dave Newton <http://stackoverflow.com/users/438992/dave-newton> >> > > >> > >> > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
