Thanks for the tip about the spelling. I did some googling, but didn't really see too much information about struts-layout as compared to some of the other technologies, which is really what I'm after.
Also, does anyone know of a way to search the lists? Every time I use the search page (http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ts.apache.org), I get "Text search not available for this list". Thanks, B. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:44 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Opinions on Struts Layout > > Look under struts-layout. The results of googling for struts-layout > are somewhat surprising and you might want to do that too. Naming is > so important. Why Struts Layout went with struts-layout is a mystery > to me. Wrong side of the brain problem, I guess. > > Jack > > > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:41:50 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > If you look at the Struts dev an user lists, Brantley, you will find > > quite a bit on this too. > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:03:59 -0500, Brantley Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > > > When our organization was making the decision between .NET and J2EE, > we > > > were really struck by how powerful MS's idea of web forms were. The > > > ability to drag/drop web controls onto a page is very attractive, > simply > > > because our developers were hired to develop; not generate HTML (as > I'm > > > sure most of you were). What eventually did .NET in (at least for us) > > > was MS's abysmal security record, and the flexibility afforded by J2EE > > > (i.e., can be deployed on any platform that has a JVM for the most > > > part). > > > > > > Struts was the first framework project we ran into after we took the > > > J2EE plunge. We all really like Struts, but we have been looking for > > > more streamlined ways of developing the view. > > > > > > Well, I ran across Struts Layout > > > (http://struts.application-servers.com/index.html). Perhaps I've been > > > living under a rock for a while, but it was something that I'd never > > > heard of before, and it seems to offer exactly what we longed for with > > > MS's canned "web controls". > > > > > > Does anyone here have any familiarity with this project? How does it > > > compare with JSF or even with some of the other presentation layer > > > projects like Velocity, etc. > > > > > > One idea that I really like about struts layout is that it's tied > > > directly back to struts, so it seems that it might be a more elegant > > > solution than mixing technologies. > > > > > > Any input? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brantley Hobbs > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." > > > > ~Native Proverb~ > > > > "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be > crows." > > > > ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ > > > > > -- > > > "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." > > ~Native Proverb~ > > "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be > crows." > > ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]