Look, Preston, if you want your own language with your own meanings, that is fine with me. But, when you are talking to others on a list, we have a right to assume that you are using words with their real meaning rather than some idiosyncratic, unknowing, use on your part. Call this "pedantic" if you like. But, if someone doesn't know a toolkit from a framework and throws the word "implementation" around like a half-penny, then I certainly don't want them working for me. This is a profession, not a hayride.
On 12/13/05, Preston Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Dakota Jack wrote: > > > Preston, none of those examples are J2EE. They can be used with J2EE > but > > they have nothing to do with anything beyond J2SE. > > Toolkit. > > As in the tools one uses to build J2EE apps. Pedantic much... > > Preston > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
