Good God, Michael, he was trying to be sarcastic and only reached sardonic but fooled you. Do you actually think a lightbulb like Raeburn would be agreeing with Revusky? Don't you realize that Raeburn is another one of "DOH" bunch?
On 3/24/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/24/06, Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have an idea. Why don't we publish the source code to Struts so that > > absolutely anyone can contribute to the project. You are right that > > we'll need a review process for all those contributions. So why don't we > > require all incoming code to be reviewed by at least one experienced > > developer before it is added to the code base. After a while, developers > > will earn a level of trust and we can relax the review requirement to > > only happen after the code is updated. > > > > Thanks for the advice. We should implement this new process right away. > > > > Steve > > Does not it work like this already? Someone opens up a Bugzilla ticket > and puts up code. Then a committer verifies it and commits it. Well, > if there is a committer who finds the code at all worthy ;-) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
