This topic has become stale, in my opinion, and I do not understand why people continue to participate in it. When people attempt to have a successful discussion, there is usually a goal to attain, but I am unable to discern what serious goal there is in telling the commiters they are, in so many words, lousy, a failure, makers of bad products, the fathers of stagnation, betrayers of their foundation, etc. :-) Discussions can be alot of fun and productive and bear good fruit, but discussions, like fruit, also wither after a season.... and I think the season is well underway for all the participants to just accept that you've been heard, not everyone will agree, and finger-pointing isn't productive. -- Paul
--- Al Eridani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/29/06, Bart Busschots <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right, as I see it this all boils down to Jon whinning that the struts > > guys are adopting WebWorks for the basis of struts 2 rather than Struts > > 1.X. > > And you see it wrongly. Either you came late into this and could not be > bothered to check the archives or your attention span is so short that > you have forgotten already. > > It all started when some Struts committers described their relatively closed > environment (limiting who could contribute) and Jonathan wondered > aloud whether that lack of openness had been a contributing factor to > Struts decline. > > The question was never addressed because, in the inmortal words of one > of the defenders of the faith, "the question is invalid". > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
