Busschots, you and Newton are really the worst on this list. You never have code or ideas, only c-r--a---p.
On 4/22/06, Bart Busschots <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jonathan Revusky wrote: > > Ted Husted wrote: > >> On 4/19/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Second, all the comitters have answered your questions very nicely > >> > >> > >> Yes, we have. > > > > I don't know whether you actually believe this in your own mind. > > However, there is a complete electronic archive of this forum and I > > don't think that examining it would support this view. > > > > Here is what I think someone would find by examining the archive. > > Whenever certain pointed questions are posed, one of two things happens: > > > > (1) The person being posed the question simply walks away from the > > discussion. This has happened at least a couple of times in > > conversations where I have asked you to clarify points you have made, > > Ted. This is also the approach Niall Pemberton has used a couple of > > times. You write something, and then when somebody brings up > > counter-arguments are asks you to clarify one or more of your points, > > you just walk away from the discussion. > > > > The other thing that frequently happens is this: > > > > (2) The other person (or sometimes a proxy) resorts to illegitimate > > ad-hominem discourse to dodge the perfectly legitimate question being > > posed. This is the approach used at different times by James Mitchell, > > Steve Raeburn, and Craig McClanahan. > I see things a little different: > > 1) Someone says they'd like to use Struts > > 2) Jack or Jon lambast struts and re-pose their standard question with > their standard opinion and lable it all as fact rather than opinion. > > 3) The developers ignore them for a while because we've been round this > roundabout a million times before > > 4) Jack or Jon insult the developers for not answering their questions > repeatedly > > 5) The developers eventually get fed up with the crap on the list an DO > answer the question > > 6) Jack and Jon insist the developers are wrong, say they still haven't > answered the question and the cycle continues > > The ultimate irony is that the developers also get lambasted for being > too slow yet are expected to waste hours of their time trawling through > mindless drivel that is constantly repeated over and over again by > people WHO DON'T CONTRIBUTE. I don't see Jon & Jack answering users > questions yet I do see them constantly and continuously attacking struts > and attacking the struts team. You've made your point lads, we're sick > of hearing it. If you are going to keep complaining that struts sucks DO > SOMETHING TO HELP or just leave us all alone. My mail client has started > to label your posts to this list as spam which says something. Even > crude AI can see that you are not contributing anything useful. > > Finally, Ted & co, thanks for your long posts in reply to these trolls, > I, as a struts user, appreciate them and am happy with them. Keep up the > good work and don't let the two grumpy old men get you down. > > I am also aware that this post is not really that useful so this will be > my only contribution to this 'discussion'. > > Bart. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~
