--- cilquirm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hadn't really started fragmenting anything yet. > I was engaging in conversation.
As was I. > My whole point was to get around the barrier of > entry of engaging people to add and modify stuff. > Getting someone else to maybe do it doesn't seem > like a form of engagement. While I agree it would be better to have the information "somewhere" rather than nowhere, it makes way more sense to me to keep as much S2 documentation as possible on the S2 Wiki. This means it gets distributed with S2 itself. If filing a CLA is to high a barrier for someone then adding a comment to a user-list email saying "I have no CLA on file; could someone please add this?" seems easier than that person creating a wiki space and posting it there instead, plus then that knowledge becomes part of the S2 project. I'm sure there's some documentation, use-cases, tutorials, etc. that are more appropriate to keep separate from the S2 wiki, but when it's (more or less) core documentation I'd rather see it as part of the project, that's all. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
