Does anyone know what the expectations are given this scenario? All I hear are crickets...
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:12 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > config-browser doesn't deserve to be exposed to the binary mess I have > created! I have refactored this Struts 2 application into oblivion. If > package D extends packages A, B, and C and package A has a custom > default-interceptor defined, shouldn't package D inherit this stack? I am > having to duplicate the stack creation from package A inside package D! I > think the only way to stop the decline of this application is to close the > lid on my laptop and focus on the Kansas v. Texas Tech game. Have you ever > "improved" code so much that you ended up where you began? > > Peace, > Scott > > > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Wes Wannemacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > Would it help if you dropped the config-browser into the app and saw how > > badly you have it mangled ;) > > > > -Wes > > > > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 18:58 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I am knee deep in a problem where I have looked at it so long that I > > am > > > nearly wrapped around the axle. Before I get into the gory details, > > what > > > does a package extend when it specifies the extends attribute followed > > by > > > multiple coma separated packages? I am chiefly interested in a > > > default-interceptor-ref that might have been established in only one > > > "parent." Should this be the stack the child adopts? I'll stop here > > before > > > blathering on about my mess. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
