I must add that the documentation is seemingly a mash-up of varying struts 2 versions (<2.1 vs >=2.1) and somewhat obtuse. I think with marked differences in implementation, the docs should be more clearly delineated. RTFM is fine when it exists, is complete and is accurate. Imagine the evolution of JavaDocs for the versions of the JDK appearing in shared files with yellow boxes, red exclamation points and call outs warning against this and that behavior depending on version!
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Lyallex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... as other people have also had an problem reading the > documentation, and personally, I also think the default is > counter-intuitive. > > Um, I didn't "have a problem reading the documentation" at all. I > just didn't read that bit. > > But it's good to know that this will change. > > Lyallex > > > > > Dave > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
