I am using the latest Freemarker version 2.3.13 and Spring 2.5 OGNL 2.7.2 with Javaassist .
Al Sutton wrote: > > Replace your freemarker lib with 2.3.13 or later. Prior releases had a > concurrency performance issue. > > Al. > > sajanv007 wrote: >> It is a solaris box and has 16 GB memory and 4 CPU it is high end server >> class machine . Some how I suspect it is the OGNL or Freemarker rendering >> issue . >> >> Jim Kiley wrote: >> >>> What kind of server are you using here, how much memory, what CPU -- >>> when >>> we >>> are getting to CPU utilization, all of these issues are relevant. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:43 PM, sajanv007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I have tried all the tuning parameters mentioned in the link somehow >>>> CPU >>>> utilization is always 80% ,I observed that it takes tags are rendered >>>> from >>>> free marker cache but still the cpu 80-90% . >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Sajan >>>> >>>> >>>> Nils-Helge Garli wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe this can help: >>>>> http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.2/docs/performance-tuning.html >>>>> >>>>> Nils-H >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:11 PM, sajanv007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> There is huge performance issue and CPU hogging with Struts2 tag , >>>>>> >>>> this >>>> >>>>>> was >>>>>> observed while rendering JSP. These are some performance results >>>>>> >>>> obtained >>>> >>>>>> Strut 2 Tag - With all performance tuning applied as per Struts 2 >>>>>> documentation - Freemarker caching etc... >>>>>> Load Runner Tool >>>>>> 40 users >>>>>> 900 hits per second >>>>>> 10 transaction per second >>>>>> >>>>>> Results >>>>>> CPU utilization 90% >>>>>> Response 3.5 sec >>>>>> >>>>>> Replaced some of Struts2 Tag , with Custom JSP Tags like (s:label, >>>>>> s:text,s:textfield,s:hidden,s:param) >>>>>> 40 users >>>>>> 900 hits per second >>>>>> 15 transaction per second >>>>>> >>>>>> Results >>>>>> CPU utilization 70% >>>>>> Response 2.0 sec >>>>>> >>>>>> Some where down the line Struts 2 tag are very cpu hungry , to people >>>>>> >>>> to >>>> >>>>>> adopt to strut2 framework cpu utilization should be optimized . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Did anybody come across on how to over come this problem >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> View this message in context: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Performance-and-High-CPU-utilization-tp19559123p19559123.html >>>> >>>>>> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://www.nabble.com/Performance-and-High-CPU-utilization-tp19559123p19560223.html >>>> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Jim Kiley >>> Technical Consultant | Summa >>> [p] 412.258.3346 [m] 412.445.1729 >>> http://www.summa-tech.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-and-High-CPU-utilization-tp19559123p19560763.html Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
