I totally misunderstood your last statement :) musachy
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is not a sin, we are suggesting alternatives, based on the fact > that there is not built in way of doing what you are asking. > > musahcy > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Chris Pratt <thechrispr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In this case it has to do with the fact that we're using Tiles to ensure >> that we get a consistent look for all our emails. Basically I've created a >> Tiles Layout that constructs the emails using tiles to include the >> text/plain and text/html versions of the content and using action properties >> to control to, from, cc, bcc, subject and the attachments. I guess I'm >> confused as to why it's a sin to ask the system for information it obviously >> has to have? >> (*Chris*) >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> If the MIME Emails are generated by tags, why don't you build the URL >>> in the jsps? >>> >>> musachy >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Chris Pratt <thechrispr...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Basically, I have some tried and true tag libraries for generating >>> pretty, >>> > MIME Emails that work great with Struts. They support all manner of >>> > attachments and have worked great for years. Occasionally I need to >>> attach >>> > something (in this case a PDF) that is generated by another action. So >>> the >>> > main action needs to have a property that returns a list of things to be >>> > attached, which in this case is a URL to the Action that generates the >>> > dynamic PDF. >>> > >>> > I'm sure there's a way to refactor all this into some unrecognizable >>> form, >>> > but this is tried and true, supports JSP and Tiles including properly >>> > formatted, pretty HTML and plain text MIME emails, and really I can't see >>> > any reason that this should be precluded from working with any system >>> that >>> > supports JSP Tag Libraries. >>> > >>> > Can you see a better way to get the generated attachment into the email? >>> > (*Chris*) >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Dave Newton <newton.d...@yahoo.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Chris Pratt wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> Strange? I would have thought this was a fairly commonly needed >>> feature >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> I've never needed to generate a URL from an action name within another >>> >> action across a half-dozen S2 apps--it can't be *that* common... I think >>> the >>> >> most hackish thing I've done like that is to use an action name as a >>> dynamic >>> >> result parameter for a "redirectAction" result type. >>> >> >>> >> IMO actions should "never" generate a URL since they're supposed to be >>> >> decoupled from the underlying action access mechanism. What's your use >>> case >>> >> that this solves? >>> >> >>> >> Dave >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
