I agree with ya.  I have been doing something very similar with hidden fields 
in my app for some time.  The server knows if a new browser instance is 
requested by checking the hidden field.  If its empty it then creates a new key 
and sets the hidden field.  Basically partitions the session based on keys.  At 
the end of the day a servlet container creates a single session for a single 
workstation.



> Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:39:30 -0800
> From: glindh...@yahoo.com
> To: user@struts.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Struts 2 session problem
> 
> 
> Yes, SEAM does:
> 
> http://www.seamframework.org/Documentation/DoesSeamSupportMultipleBrowserWindowsOrTabs
> 
> I haven't dug into exactly how they do it but I would not be surprised if
> they pass around a hidden conversation token with every request.  Then any
> state information that gets stored in the session would include the
> conversation id.
> 
> Passing around a conversation token is something a developer could do
> manually, but it's also a feature that could be built into the framework to
> make it easy for all to use.
> 
> 
> Jim Kiley wrote:
> > 
> > Are there frameworks that handle this situation differently?  It's a
> > browser-side issue, so it isn't clear to me how a server-side framework
> > could solve it.
> > jk
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Greg Lindholm <glindh...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >>
> >> Oh I fully understand this is a issue with how browsers deal with
> >> sessions.
> >> However these are the browsers our apps have to work with so as a
> >> developer
> >> I have to make the apps work with them and I expect any decent app
> >> framework
> >> to have good solutions to all the common use cases. And I consider having
> >> multiple windows/tabs open to the same app a very common use case.
> >>
> >> If some other framework (like SEAM) is handling this issue better then
> >> let
> >> see if we can implement the same solution in Struts 2.
> >>
> >> Correction: In my last post I meant to say "Conversation token"  not
> >> "Session token".
> >>
> >>
> >> Rubbinio wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This is not really a struts 2 issue but a browser issue. This is the
> >> way
> >> > firefox persists sessions. If you try same thing in IE6 it will work
> >> fine,
> >> > IE7 some times and IE8 fully emulates firefox.
> >> >
> >> > Furthermore you can try this with gmail and you will see the same
> >> > behaviour. This is a fairly well known "limitation" of firefox if you
> >> want
> >> > to call it a limitation, I for one think this is the correct thing to
> >> do,
> >> > and since even IE8 starts doing this looks like it is.
> >> >
> >> > The solution for FF is to use profiles. Just google for 'Firefox
> >> multiple
> >> > sessions.
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Greg Lindholm [mailto:glindh...@yahoo.com]
> >> > Sent: January 19, 2009 2:19 PM
> >> > To: user@struts.apache.org
> >> > Subject: Re: Struts 2 session problem
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > I find I need this all the time when developing; I want to login as 2
> >> > different users and test multi-user interactions.  Currently I'm forced
> >> to
> >> > use 2 different browsers, login once with Firefox and once with IE.
> >> > This works for development but wouldn't be an acceptable answer for
> >> users
> >> > (plus many work places dictate the browser you will use and don't allow
> >> > "users" to install other browsers.)
> >> >
> >> > Fortunately the only thing I store in the session is a Login object
> >> with
> >> > user credentials and preferences etc.  so this allows a user to have
> >> > multiple browser windows open to the same application, they share the
> >> same
> >> > session (this is the more common use case.)
> >> >
> >> > I have a harder time coming up with a legitimate use case for allowing
> >> an
> >> > ordinary user to be logged into 2 different accounts at the same time.
> >> > (I'm
> >> > sure that there are legitimate cases but they are more fringe.)
> >> >
> >> > On the other hand, if you use "conversation scope" wizards etc. in your
> >> > app
> >> > I would expect a user to be able to have a separate conversation in
> >> each
> >> > open window (shared session) without stomping on each other.  This
> >> would
> >> > mean the conversation state could not be stored in the session unless
> >> it
> >> > is
> >> > identified with a particular window/tab/frame etc. (a session token
> >> could
> >> > be
> >> > used in a hidden field).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > newton.dave wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> dusty wrote:
> >> >>> Creating a separate subsystem on the server to partition a single
> >> HTTP
> >> >>> session for multiple users and maintain the conversation is classic
> >> >>> overengineering.   Seems like Seam has gone to a lot of trouble to
> >> >>> provide
> >> >>> just another way to persist state.
> >> >>
> >> >> It's not "over-engineering" to allow multiple tabs per user, each
> >> having
> >> >> their own state--some applications benefit from this functionality,
> >> for
> >> >> several different reasons. I bet if you gave it some thought you'd be
> >> >> able to come up with several trivial examples of when and why you'd
> >> need
> >> >> this functionality.
> >> >>
> >> >> Dave
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >> > http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-session-problem-tp21513305p21549675.html
> >> > Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-session-problem-tp21513305p21550453.html
> >> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jim Kiley
> > Technical Consultant | Summa
> > [p] 412.258.3346 [m] 412.445.1729
> > http://www.summa-tech.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Struts-2-session-problem-tp21513305p21551088.html
> Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org
> 

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Liveā„¢: Keep your life in sync. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_howitworks_012009

Reply via email to