I dropped your classes into showcase, and I am getting this: Action1.execute() Action1.execute() : getPageName() = null Action1.execute() : getPageName() = PageNameFromAction1
Action2.execute() Action2.execute() : getPageName() = PageNameFromAction1 which seems ok. musachy On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Musachy Barroso <musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the testcase. I am looking at it, and there is a very > similar case in showcase, but it seems fine. > > http://localhost:8080/struts2-showcase/actionchaining/actionChain1!input > > the output is: > > Action Chain 1 Property 1: Property Set In Action Chain 1 > Action Chain 2 Property 1: Property Set in Action Chain 2 > Action Chain 3 Property 1: Property set in Action Chain 3 > > Do you see any difference from your testcase (which I haven't run yet) > > musachy > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:10 PM, <Becky.L.O'sulli...@healthnet.com> wrote: >> Thanks, bug WW-2970 was submitted along with a test case. >> -B >> >> >> >> >> Musachy Barroso >> <musa...@gmail.co >> m> To >> Struts Users Mailing List >> 01/28/2009 11:43 <user@struts.apache.org> >> AM cc >> >> Subject >> Please respond to Re: [S2] possible bug in 2.1.6 w/ >> "Struts Users action chaining >> Mailing List" >> <u...@struts.apac >> he.org> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> This is the first report I hear, open a jira ticket and describe a >> test case to replicate the problem. >> >> musachy >> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:03 PM, <Becky.L.O'sulli...@healthnet.com> >> wrote: >>> Hadn't heard back from anyone about this. I'll go ahead and file a bug >>> report. >>> No one is using action chaining with 2.1.6? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -B >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Becky.L.O'Sulliva >>> n...@healthnet.com >>> To >>> 01/27/2009 11:58 "Struts Users Mailing List" >>> AM <user@struts.apache.org> >>> cc >>> >>> Please respond to Subject >>> "Struts Users [S2] possible bug in 2.1.6 w/ >>> Mailing List" action chaining >>> <u...@struts.apac >>> he.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi group, >>> >>> We're trying to upgrade from 2.1.2 to 2.1.6 and ran into an issue. >>> >>> We use action chaining because it suits a particular requirement we had >> for >>> this application. >>> However, after upgrading, we're seeing that the value stack isn't holding >>> on to values set by actions further up in the chain. Has anyone tested >>> 2.1.6 with the chain interceptor? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Becky >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message, together with any attachments, is >>> intended only for the use of the individual or entity >>> to which it is addressed. It may contain information >>> that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby >>> notified that any dissemination or copying of this >>> message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If >>> you have received this message in error, please notify >>> the original sender immediately by telephone or by >>> return e-mail and delete this message, along with any >>> attachments, from your computer. Thank you. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message, together with any attachments, is >>> intended only for the use of the individual or entity >>> to which it is addressed. It may contain information >>> that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby >>> notified that any dissemination or copying of this >>> message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If >>> you have received this message in error, please notify >>> the original sender immediately by telephone or by >>> return e-mail and delete this message, along with any >>> attachments, from your computer. Thank you. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message, together with any attachments, is >> intended only for the use of the individual or entity >> to which it is addressed. It may contain information >> that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure. >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby >> notified that any dissemination or copying of this >> message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If >> you have received this message in error, please notify >> the original sender immediately by telephone or by >> return e-mail and delete this message, along with any >> attachments, from your computer. Thank you. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org