As I've said I am using pretty much same approach as it was suggested above by the other poster.
I have list. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: > This question has been asked and answered quite a few times. I agree > the documentation should reflect this; as we're a volunteer group all > assistance is appreciated. Feel free to file a CLA and update the docs > to accurately reflect current behavior, and add entries to the FAQ if > it addresses a typical pain point. > > And my book specifically *did* address many types of best practices, > but mine, like all other books, have a limited number of pages, and > which information is included/excluded is not always up to the author. > > The reason the docs for checkbox don't address this typical case is > because it has nothing specifically to do with checkboxes. > > If you're having a specific issue, post your code, configuration, and > Struts version, otherwise we can't really help. > > Dave > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Peter Bliznak <pbliz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Listen I googled quite a while before I asked here and all I saw was sea > of > > lost souls asking same question dating back to 2007...but NOT > answers...if > > it is so simple and obvious then why docs for checkbox are not mentioning > > this trivial case. ...... BTW would you please point me to the site where > > there is nicely organized reading on Best Struts2 Practices....I will > truly > > appreciate it. (S2 in Action didn't mention and book written by guy with > > similar same like yours neither....aside from that Ive' read 3 > more...guess > > what... nobody mentioned it anywhere) > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Oh, I understand. Definitely agree; I think the OP just isn't aware of > >> some S2 functionality and/or best practices, that's all. > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> On Tuesday, October 26, 2010, Li Ying <liying.cn.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I mean: > >> > > >> > Representing associated data by a DTO class and then holding DTO > >> > instances in one List > >> > > >> > is better than > >> > > >> > Holding data in several separated Lists each represent one column. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2010/10/26 Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com>: > >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Li Ying wrote: > >> >>> I think this is a better design, because the data modal is more > >> >>> compliant with OO principles. > >> >> > >> >> Better than what? > >> >> > >> >> (And as an aside, there's nothing particularly OO about what's > >> >> essentially a struct, although from a pragmatic viewpoint, > >> >> particularly when doing data transfer, sometimes such constructs seem > >> >> reasonable. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DumbDataObject for a brief > >> >> discussion.) > >> >> > >> >> Dave > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@struts.apache.org > >
