Much appreciated Joe. Let me get this straight: higher throughput with persistent messaging + asyncSend vs. non-persistent messaging? It wouldn't be the same throughput?
Joe Fernandez wrote: > > Non-persistent messages are, by default, sent asynchronously (a.k.a., fire > and forget). > > Yes, if you send persistent messages with asyncSend, you will realize a > nice boost in throughput. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Non-persistent-queue%2C-asyncSend-tp27179026p27182943.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
