I am not comparing the throughput of non-persistent messages with persistent messages that have asyncSend. I am just pointing out that your throughput for sending persistent messages will improve if you send the persistent messages with asyncSend. Question is, what is the risk-level of sending persistent messages with asyncSend?
Joe jongraf wrote: > > Much appreciated Joe. Let me get this straight: higher throughput with > persistent messaging + asyncSend vs. non-persistent messaging? It > wouldn't be the same throughput? > > > Joe Fernandez wrote: >> >> Non-persistent messages are, by default, sent asynchronously (a.k.a., >> fire and forget). >> >> Yes, if you send persistent messages with asyncSend, you will realize a >> nice boost in throughput. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Non-persistent-queue%2C-asyncSend-tp27179026p27183017.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
