Gary, Forgot to add that I do see the same thing in JConsole, that is the negative counts.
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Colleen Velo <cmv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gary, > > Thanks for the clarification - still working on a JUnit test. > Currently right now the steps that I use to reproduce it is > to have the 3 producers each send *60,000* messages each to > the ActiveMQ cluster at the same time - more often than > not, when the queue is trending down towards 0 on the > broker(s), sometimes a negative # will appear in the "Pending Msgs" > column (it has been frustrating because it seems to happen > intermittently). > > *Current Setup:* > > • 3 producers > • 3 brokers (all part of the same ActiveMQ cluster) > • 3 consumers > • 1 queue > > > *Broker definition*: > • <networkConnector name="ActiveMQ Cluster" > uri="static:(tcp://brokersvr1:61616,tcp://brokersvr2:61616,tcp://brokersvr3:61616)" > conduitSubscriptions="false" dynamicOnly="true" > decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority="true" > suppressDuplicateQueueSubscriptions="true" duplex="false" networkTTL="5"/> > > *Client definition:* > • > amq.publisher.broker.url=failover\:tcp\://brokersvr1\:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&daemon=true,tcp\://brokersvr2\:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&daemon=true,tcp\://brokersvr3\:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&daemon=true > > > Let me know if you have any more questions and I'll pass along the JUnit > test as soon > as I can get one to fail consistently. > > Thanks, > > -- > Colleen Velo > email: cmv...@gmail.com > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Some series of steps that can reproduce or in the ideal case a junit >> test we can drop into the source. >> >> On Wednesday, September 1, 2010, Colleen Velo <cmv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Gary >> > re: JConsole - don't know yet. I will try to hook JConsole up and look >> > through that as well - >> > currently using the bundled web admin console. >> > >> > As far as test case, I don't have one - just the standard message >> traffic >> > from >> > our producers to our consumers (slightly less than the traffic that is >> > running >> > currently in our Product environment with ActiveMQ server version 5.2.0. >> > >> > What would you need exactly for a "test" case? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > -- >> > Colleen Velo >> > *email: cmv...@gmail.com* >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> does jconsole show the same negative number? Do you have a test case? >> >> >> >> On 1 September 2010 13:52, Colleen Velo <cmv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > After only running my 3 ActiveMQ brokers for short time, I am seeing >> >> > negative numbers in >> >> > the "Number of Pending Messages" column. I started seeing this at >> 5.3.2 >> >> > (after upgrading >> >> > from 5.2.0) and opened and issue on it: >> >> > • https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2887 >> >> > >> >> > It was recommended that I upgrade to ActiveMQ 5.4.0, which I did, >> >> however, I >> >> > am still >> >> > seeing this issue. >> >> > >> >> > Current Environment: >> >> > • CentOS release 5.2 (both consumers and brokers) >> >> > • 3 ActiveMQ brokers >> >> > • 7 consumers (across different queues) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Colleen Velo >> >> > email: cmv...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://blog.garytully.com >> >> >> >> Open Source Integration >> >> http://fusesource.com >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> http://blog.garytully.com >> >> Open Source Integration >> http://fusesource.com >> > > -- Colleen Velo email: cmv...@gmail.com
