replace "network" with "cluster" or "master/slave pairs" or "collection" it does not make any difference. The enhancement is that a connection in a pool will get a chance to be randomized again by the failover transport.
The relationship between the brokers, if any, is independent. On 13 April 2011 16:03, nnprasad <nnakarika...@dwd.in.gov> wrote: > The link which Gary gave..saying > > "It might make sense to restrict the lifetime of connections in a connection > pool, so that once in a while the connection is refreshed providing a chance > of connection load balancing over a network of brokers." > > and here the main poster of this message told that he is *not* using the > network of brokers > > > I am confused. Please explain in your leisure. > > Thank You > Nag. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Force-a-failover-re-randomize-tp3445497p3447393.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- http://blog.garytully.com http://fusesource.com
