What's the reason behind wanting to avoid using the JMS layer in favor of the proprietary Artemis core API? I've not done anything with Artemis, so this is very much a question from a place of ignorance, but Quinn's statement sounded a lot like "I only want to use Hibernate-proprietary APIs, none of those pesky JPA-standard ones that might let me interoperate or swap underlying technologies later," and I'm curious about the logic that led to the statement...
Tim On Oct 18, 2016 3:55 PM, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Quinn Stevenson > <qu...@pronoia-solutions.com> wrote: > > Clebert - > > > > Thank you for your input! > > > > I try and avoid XA transactions whenever possible as well. I do have a > few customers that insist on transactions when they do JMS->JMS routes (the > JMS destination are in different brokers/servers - hence the need for XA). > > got it... was just pointing my 2 cents there. Try to batch (like 1000 > messages & 1000 whatever else you are doing on a single TX). if you > can. > > > > > This is really the last piece I need to figure out before I’ll be able > to implement Artemis (core only) into our standard flows. I know we can > always use the JMS layer, but I’d like to be able to use just the core if I > can. > > > > all the methods available on JMS for XA are also available on > ClientSession. There shouldn't be any difference. > > Let me know If you can't figure out, and I (or someone else) may write > an example > > > > I’m planning on doing the integration in Camel, and it’s looking more > and more like I’ll need an “artemis-camel” (hosted in the Artemis source) > or a “camel-artemis” (hosted in the Camel Components source). Any thoughts > on which would be the most appropriate place for the component? ActiveMQ > 5.x has the activemq-camel component, but it always seemed to me it was in > the wrong place - that it should be camel-activemq. > > > > > I looked at the camel component on AMQ5 at some time ago and it would > be simple to port it. I thought it wasn't needed though. but if you > need it we can add something into artemis/master just like AMQ5 has > one. > > Can you add it? Send a PR... we accept PRs :) > > > if you even send it soon, I'm planning a release early next week. if > it's well done (well done means.. not breaking anything) it might be > there before we release it. >
