Stephen wrote: > > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> On Monday 15 March 2004 16:23, Daniel Frey wrote: >> >>> Thanks Alex for the example. Nice code! I see there that the main frame >>> is generated within the execute method, an approach that I was taking, >>> but was not sure about. >> >> Since I know my own agenda, I recommend that you use the Startable >> interface instead... I think there will be consensus to remove Executable
>> in Framework 5.0, since the Startable can do the same job. > > I think this subject will raise a bit of debate. Startable is a > non-blocking operation whereas Executable is in-line execution. As > such, you can correlated Initializable and Executable much more closely > that Executable and Startable. I think in the execute/start method the main frame is build and shown. But I think a separation of roles would be good in terms of being responsible for - an initial setup, coordination of managers and start of the whole application - a GUI - the main frame (see thread "Merlin for Applications") Both might implement Initializable, Startable and/or Executable. So which one is now the right one for what exactly? Daniel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
