Niclas wrote:
> On Monday 15 March 2004 16:51, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>>> On Monday 15 March 2004 16:23, Daniel Frey wrote:
>>>> Thanks Alex for the example. Nice code! I see there that the main frame
>>>> is generated within the execute method, an approach that I was taking,
>>>> but was not sure about.
>>>
>>> Since I know my own agenda, I recommend that you use the Startable
>>> interface instead... I think there will be consensus to remove
>>> Executable in Framework 5.0, since the Startable can do the same job.
>>
>> I think this subject will raise a bit of debate. Startable is a
>> non-blocking operation whereas Executable is in-line execution. As
>> such, you can correlated Initializable and Executable much more closely
>> that Executable and Startable.
>
> Not sure what you mean by "non-blocking", since there are no differences
> between the two in Merlin. Both will result in a activation timeout if not
> returning. The only difference, AFAICT, is that the component author need
> to replace
>
> public void execute()
>
> with
>
> public void stop() { }
>
> public void start()
Why is execute() replaced with stop() and start()? I don't understand the
logic behind it.
> IMO, a reasonable request for an upgrade of MAJOR version.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
