On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:32 PM, erh <ehas...@transunion.com> wrote: > > > > Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have just backported a fix for CAMEL-1878 to 1.x as well. >> You are welcome to try with a new 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT whether it fixes your >> bean problem. >> >> > > Do the snapshots get built automatically? The dates on the files in the > 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT directory are a bit odd. The md5 and sha1 files have a > timestamp from October 4th, but the tarballs are from September 29th and > 16th. Shouldn't the timestamps on these files be much closer together? >
You can not trust the dates on the folders etc. Its the Apache infrastructure that uses Hudson that deploys those builds. The actual -SNAPSHOT file however doe have correct timestamps. The real releases however should have correct timestamps for all artifacts and folders. > eric > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/using-methodName-for-bean-binding-doesn%27t-work-with-Processor-beans-tp25716723p25754739.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
