On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:57 AM, _Jens <jens.riemschnei...@icw.de> wrote: > > Just debugged this a bit and it seems that processors have to implement > Service to be instrumented. The processor for setHeader only implements > Processor, whereas TransformProcessor extends ServiceSupport. >
Ah well spotted. I wonder if we should add management of these micro processors anyway. It makes more sense to have processors specific management where you can manipulate them at runtime. > > _Jens wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just checked out the new example for the JMX management in Camel 2.1. >> When I run the example and browse the MBeans with JConsole, I can see all >> the processors of the route being instrumented. I then added a setHeader >> to the route, but it was not shown in JConsole. However, a transform step >> I added as well was shown. What is the plan for instrumenting processors? >> Will there be some processors of some specific type that are not >> instrumented? I understand that this is still work in progress, just >> wanted to know what we can expect. >> >> Thanks, >> Jens >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JMX-in-Camel-2.1---Processor-MBeans-tp25799266p25799847.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/davsclaus
