Gotcha. Reading the link that Hadrian supplied it seems that this applies to Apache projects but not necessarily for projects under the Apache License - is that correct? If the project continued to be provided under the Apache License 2 but hosted entirely within GitHub would that be acceptable? Or would it need to be released under a different license? Or can it not exist at all?
Ashwin Karpe wrote: > > Yes. Apache projects are required to ensure that project artifacts do not > rope in dependencies/code that directly or indirectly rope in closed > source software or non-compatible license based dependencies. > > This can expose the project to legal complications and makes the Apache > license on the component itself to question... The Camel PMC is > responsible for ensuring that this does not happen... > -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Writing-own-Camel-Components-tp4969523p4979303.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
