On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Preben.Asmussen <p...@dr.dk> wrote: > It seems that there are at least 2 discussions going on here if I'm not > wrong. > > That Spring tries to commit even though the transaction is marked for > rollback, and that that the jmx statistics reflects completed on exchanges > that are rolled back. >
Yeah the JPA consumer should rollback, that is a bug which I have reproduced and will get fixed. > At the end whole batch of 100 is rolled back, but the statistics reflects > that some are completed. Should this be regarded as this expected behaviour > ? > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Misleading-jmx-statistics-on-jpa-component-tp4960503p4964858.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
